[PATCH] viopath: use completion

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 #include <linux/wait.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
 
 #include <asm/system.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>

@@ -115,7 +116,7 @@ static int proc_viopath_show(struct seq_
 	u16 vlanMap;
 	dma_addr_t handle;
 	HvLpEvent_Rc hvrc;
-	DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED(Semaphore);
+	DECLARE_COMPLETION(done);
 	struct device_node *node;
 	const char *sysid;
 

@@ -132,13 +133,13 @@ static int proc_viopath_show(struct seq_
 			HvLpEvent_AckInd_DoAck, HvLpEvent_AckType_ImmediateAck,
 			viopath_sourceinst(viopath_hostLp),
 			viopath_targetinst(viopath_hostLp),
-			(u64)(unsigned long)&Semaphore, VIOVERSION << 16,
+			(u64)(unsigned long)&done, VIOVERSION << 16,
 			((u64)handle) << 32, HW_PAGE_SIZE, 0, 0);
 
 	if (hvrc != HvLpEvent_Rc_Good)
 		printk(VIOPATH_KERN_WARN "hv error on op %d\n", (int)hvrc);
 
-	down(&Semaphore);
+	wait_for_completion(&done);
 
 	vlanMap = HvLpConfig_getVirtualLanIndexMap();
 

@@ -353,7 +354,7 @@ static void handleConfig(struct HvLpEven
 		return;
 	}
 
-	up((struct semaphore *)event->xCorrelationToken);
+	complete((struct completion *)event->xCorrelationToken);
 }
 
 /*

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void handleMonitorEvent(struct Hv
  * if system_state is not SYSTEM_RUNNING, then wait_atomic is used ...
  */
 struct alloc_parms {
-	struct semaphore sem;
+	struct completion done;
 	int number;
 	atomic_t wait_atomic;
 	int used_wait_atomic;

@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ static void viopath_donealloc(void *parm
 	if (parmsp->used_wait_atomic)
 		atomic_set(&parmsp->wait_atomic, 0);
 	else
-		up(&parmsp->sem);
+		complete(&parmsp->done);
 }
 
 static int allocateEvents(HvLpIndex remoteLp, int numEvents)

@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int allocateEvents(HvLpIndex remo
 		atomic_set(&parms.wait_atomic, 1);
 	} else {
 		parms.used_wait_atomic = 0;
-		init_MUTEX_LOCKED(&parms.sem);
+		init_completion(&parms.done);
 	}
 	mf_allocate_lp_events(remoteLp, HvLpEvent_Type_VirtualIo, 250,	/* It would be nice to put a real number here! */
 			    numEvents, &viopath_donealloc, &parms);

@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int allocateEvents(HvLpIndex remo
 		while (atomic_read(&parms.wait_atomic))
 			mb();
 	} else
-		down(&parms.sem);
+		wait_for_completion(&parms.done);
 	return parms.number;
 }
 

@@ -585,10 +585,10 @@ int viopath_close(HvLpIndex remoteLp, in
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&statuslock, flags);
 
 	parms.used_wait_atomic = 0;
-	init_MUTEX_LOCKED(&parms.sem);
+	init_completion(&parms.done);
 	mf_deallocate_lp_events(remoteLp, HvLpEvent_Type_VirtualIo,
 			      numReq, &viopath_donealloc, &parms);
-	down(&parms.sem);
+	wait_for_completion(&parms.done);
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&statuslock, flags);
 	for (i = 0, numOpen = 0; i < VIO_MAX_SUBTYPES; i++)