6 messages, 4 authors, 2007-02-16 · open the first message on its own page
From: <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-16 20:25:36
I'm using lastest ELDK (4.1) with Linux 2.6.19.2. After upgrading from ELDK 4.0 I can't get any of my user apps to build. The problem is that many of the headers that were in include/asm-ppc are now gone. For example, posix_types.h and sigcontext.h. All the other arches seem to have a full complement of header files in their asm directories. Can someone give me a clue?? Thanks!
From: Andy Fleming <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-16 20:45:07
They're probably in include/asm-powerpc/ You'll need both, since there are still some files in asm-ppc that are needed by the asm-powerpc stuff. On Feb 16, 2007, at 14:25, [off-list ref] [off-list ref] wrote:
I'm using lastest ELDK (4.1) with Linux 2.6.19.2. After upgrading from ELDK 4.0 I can't get any of my user apps to build. The problem is that many of the headers that were in include/asm-ppc are now gone. For example, posix_types.h and sigcontext.h. All the other arches seem to have a full complement of header files in their asm directories. Can someone give me a clue?? Thanks! _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-embedded mailing list Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2007-02-16 20:56:02
On Friday 16 February 2007 21:45, Andy Fleming wrote:
=20 They're probably in include/asm-powerpc/ =20 You'll need both, since there are still some files in asm-ppc that =A0 are needed by the asm-powerpc stuff.
That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should really report that as a bug. Arnd <><
From: Andy Fleming <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-16 21:19:37
On Feb 16, 2007, at 14:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 16 February 2007 21:45, Andy Fleming wrote:quoted
They're probably in include/asm-powerpc/ You'll need both, since there are still some files in asm-ppc that are needed by the asm-powerpc stuff.That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should really report that as a bug.
I might be wrong. But last I heard, there's a link between arch/ powerpc/include/asm and include/asm-ppc And visa-versa.
Arnd <><
From: Timur Tabi <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-16 22:40:56
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should really report that as a bug.
I thought applications weren't supposed to include kernel header files? -- Timur Tabi Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2007-02-16 23:22:51
On Friday 16 February 2007 23:40, Timur Tabi wrote:
quoted
That shouldn't be the case, the headers from asm-powerpc should be sufficient for all 32 and 64 bit user apps, if not then you should really report that as a bug.I thought applications weren't supposed to include kernel header files?
Right, but glibc depends on them. We now have a mechanism of installing a subset of the kernel headers with 'make headers_install' in order to be used by glibc. This currently will install a set of the asm-powerpc files, but we got rid of all user dependencies on asm-ppc headers. Arnd <><