From: Michael Neuling <hidden> Date: 2006-08-16 04:00:33
The RTAS console doesn't have to be Cell specific. If we have both
the put and get char RTAS functions, init the rtas console.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
---
Paulus: This is relatively low risk, so if the Cell guys ack it, it
could be a candidate for 2.6.18.
arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/setup.c | 4 ----
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
===================================================================
@@ -910,6 +910,11 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_rtas(unsigbasep=of_get_flat_dt_prop(node,"get-term-char",NULL);if(basep)rtas_getchar_token=*basep;++if(rtas_putchar_token!=RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE&&+rtas_getchar_token!=RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)+udbg_init_rtas_console();+#endif/* break now */
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden> Date: 2006-08-16 05:21:35
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 23:00 -0500, Michael Neuling wrote:
quoted hunk
The RTAS console doesn't have to be Cell specific. If we have both
the put and get char RTAS functions, init the rtas console.
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
===================================================================
@@ -910,6 +910,11 @@ int __init early_init_dt_scan_rtas(unsigbasep=of_get_flat_dt_prop(node,"get-term-char",NULL);if(basep)rtas_getchar_token=*basep;++if(rtas_putchar_token!=RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE&&+rtas_getchar_token!=RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)+udbg_init_rtas_console();+#endif/* break now */
@@ -150,10 +150,6 @@ static int __init cell_probe(void)!of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root,"IBM,CPBW-1.0"))return0;-#ifdef CONFIG_UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE-udbg_init_rtas_console();-#endif-
I'd like to see it still guarded by UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE, otherwise there's
no way to select a different type of early console on a machine which
has those tokens in the device tree.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
From: Michael Neuling <hidden> Date: 2006-08-16 15:22:56
In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
--=-PNKyW5KJv4630LcmkXVt
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 23:00 -0500, Michael Neuling wrote:
quoted
The RTAS console doesn't have to be Cell specific. If we have both
the put and get char RTAS functions, init the rtas console.
=20
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
I'd like to see it still guarded by UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE, otherwise there's
no way to select a different type of early console on a machine which
has those tokens in the device tree.
Agreed but that section in rtas.c is already guarded by
UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE. After applying the patch, it looks like:
#ifdef CONFIG_UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE
basep = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "put-term-char", NULL);
if (basep)
rtas_putchar_token = *basep;
basep = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "get-term-char", NULL);
if (basep)
rtas_getchar_token = *basep;
if (rtas_putchar_token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
rtas_getchar_token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
udbg_init_rtas_console();
#endif
Mikey
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden> Date: 2006-08-17 00:44:12
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 10:22 -0500, Michael Neuling wrote:
In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
quoted
--=-PNKyW5KJv4630LcmkXVt
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 23:00 -0500, Michael Neuling wrote:
quoted
The RTAS console doesn't have to be Cell specific. If we have both
the put and get char RTAS functions, init the rtas console.
=20
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
I'd like to see it still guarded by UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE, otherwise there's
no way to select a different type of early console on a machine which
has those tokens in the device tree.
Agreed but that section in rtas.c is already guarded by
UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE. After applying the patch, it looks like:
#ifdef CONFIG_UDBG_RTAS_CONSOLE
basep = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "put-term-char", NULL);
if (basep)
rtas_putchar_token = *basep;
basep = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "get-term-char", NULL);
if (basep)
rtas_getchar_token = *basep;
if (rtas_putchar_token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE &&
rtas_getchar_token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
udbg_init_rtas_console();
#endif
Ah sorry, I just looked at the patch.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person