Re: [PATCH] SLB shadow buffer

2 messages, 2 authors, 2006-08-08 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] SLB shadow buffer

From: Milton Miller <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-08 01:17:38

On Mon Aug  7 2006 01:19:19 AM CDT, Michael Neuling wrote:
Updated with comments from Milton.
Better
+#define SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID \
+		(SLBSHADOW_SAVEAREA + 0x10*(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1))
+#define SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_VSID \
+		(SLBSHADOW_SAVEAREA + 0x10*(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1) + 8)
+
Still a bit of magic size, but not likely to change.

Maybe an expicit define for the slot?

+	/* Update the last bolted SLB */
+	ld	r9,PACA_SLBSHADOWPTR(r13)
+ 	li	r12,0
+  	std	r12,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID(r9) /* Clear ESID */
+	std	r7,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_VSID(r9)  /* Save VSID */
+ 	std	r0,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID(r9)  /* Save ESID */
+
 Still some leading spaces hiding
 Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/lppaca.h
quoted hunk
@@ -133,5 +135,22 @@ struct > > > lppaca {
 
 extern struct lppaca lppaca[];
 
+/*
+ * SLB shadow buffer structure as defined in the PAPR.  The save_area
+ * contains adjacent ESID and VSID pairs for each shadowed SLB.  The
+ * ESID is stored in the lower 64bits, then the VSID.
+ */
+struct slb_shadow {
+	u32	persistent;		// Number of persistent SLBs	x00-x03
+	u32	buffer_length;		// Total shadow buffer length	x04-x07
+	u64	reserved;		// Alignment			x08-x0f
+	struct	{
+		u64     esid;
+		u64	vsid;
+	} save_area[SLB_NUM_BOLTED];	//				x10-x40
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
+
C comments ... or in the separate cleanup patch
+extern struct slb_shadow slb_shadow[];
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_LPPACA_H */
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h
===================================================================

 	/* accumulated system TB ticks */
 	u64 startpurr;			/* PURR/TB value snapshot */
+
+	struct slb_shadow *slb_shadow_ptr;
 };
 
Do we need the extra line?  (I haven't looked at the result)

milton

Re: [PATCH] SLB shadow buffer

From: Michael Neuling <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-08 04:21:05

quoted
+#define SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID \
+		(SLBSHADOW_SAVEAREA + 0x10*(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1))
+#define SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_VSID \
+		(SLBSHADOW_SAVEAREA + 0x10*(SLB_NUM_BOLTED-1) + 8)
+
Still a bit of magic size, but not likely to change.

Maybe an expicit define for the slot?
Arrh nice, I can do this all in asm-offsets.  Much less magic.
quoted
+	/* Update the last bolted SLB */
+	ld	r9,PACA_SLBSHADOWPTR(r13)
+ 	li	r12,0
+  	std	r12,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID(r9) /* Clear ESID */
+	std	r7,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_VSID(r9)  /* Save VSID */
+ 	std	r0,SHADOW_SLB_BOLTED_STACK_ESID(r9)  /* Save ESID */
+
 Still some leading spaces hiding
Yep... oops.  
quoted
 Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/lppaca.h
quoted
@@ -133,5 +135,22 @@ struct > > > lppaca {
 
 extern struct lppaca lppaca[];
 
+/*
+ * SLB shadow buffer structure as defined in the PAPR.  The save_area
+ * contains adjacent ESID and VSID pairs for each shadowed SLB.  The
+ * ESID is stored in the lower 64bits, then the VSID.
+ */
+struct slb_shadow {
+	u32	persistent;		// Number of persistent SLBs	x00-x03
+	u32	buffer_length;		// Total shadow buffer length	x04-x07
+	u64	reserved;		// Alignment			x08-x0f
+	struct	{
+		u64     esid;
+		u64	vsid;
+	} save_area[SLB_NUM_BOLTED];	//				x10-x40
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
+
C comments ... or in the separate cleanup patch
I think I'll post a full lppaca cleanup patch in a bit.  
quoted
+extern struct slb_shadow slb_shadow[];
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_LPPACA_H */
Index: linux-2.6-ozlabs/include/asm-powerpc/paca.h
===================================================================

 	/* accumulated system TB ticks */
 	u64 startpurr;			/* PURR/TB value snapshot */
+
+	struct slb_shadow *slb_shadow_ptr;
 };
 
Do we need the extra line?  (I haven't looked at the result)
They are broken into logical groups, so no.

Updated patch to come.

Michael
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help