Re: [PATCH 2/10 v2] Add the MPC8641 HPCN platform files.

3 messages, 3 authors, 2006-06-10 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 2/10 v2] Add the MPC8641 HPCN platform files.

From: Jon Loeliger <hidden>
Date: 2006-06-09 15:55:08

So, like, the other day Benjamin Herrenschmidt mumbled:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 16:57 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
quoted
+void
+mpc86xx_restart(char *cmd)
+{
+	void __iomem *rstcr;
+
+	local_irq_disable();
+
+	/* Assert reset request to Reset Control Register */
+	rstcr = ioremap(get_immrbase() + MPC86XX_RSTCR_OFFSET, 0x100);
+	out_be32(rstcr, 0x2);
+
+	/* not reached */
+}
ioremap with irq disabled isn't great....  You should do the ioremap
once at boot.
OK.  Would this be acceptable instead:

    mpc86xx_restart(char *cmd)
    {
	void __iomem *rstcr;

	rstcr = ioremap(get_immrbase() + MPC86XX_RSTCR_OFFSET, 0x100);

	local_irq_disable();

	/* Assert reset request to Reset Control Register */
	out_be32(rstcr, 0x2);
	/* not reached */
    }

Overall, that file is too small :) Move those into your setup.c and make
those static...
Will do.
[SMP code snipped]

This file could/should be called *_smp.c and not need #ifdef's :)
OK.

Most of the values above should probably be retreived from the
device-tree.
I'll see what I can remove.  Some of the PCI/PCI-e bits
_will_ be device tree derived, but just not quite there yet...
It's just not going to be a perfect first patch;  there
will have to be incremental development in that direction.
As I suggested before, the 2 above should be static in your setup file.
Right.
quoted
+extern int __init add_bridge(struct device_node *dev);
Aren't we exposing that already via some header ?
Perhaps.  I'll look around for it.
quoted
+extern void __init setup_indirect_pex_nomap(struct pci_controller* hose,
+					    void __iomem * cfg_addr,
+					    void __iomem * cfg_data);
+
+extern struct smp_ops_t smp_8641_ops;
See my comments about the PCI stuff with the PCI patch.
and...
All of the above should of course come from the device-tree. 2.6.18 will
have the support for having interrupt routing from it without having
nodes for all devices. I'll post it to the list in a week or so, I'm
coding right now :)
Right.  We're not quite entirely able to convert it
all to device tree yet.  Working on it still...
quoted
+	phys_addr_t OpenPIC_PAddr;
+
+	/* Determine the Physical Address of the OpenPIC regs */
+	OpenPIC_PAddr = get_immrbase() + MPC86xx_OPENPIC_OFFSET;
Do you really _need_ studly caps ? I know we did that before but you
don't have to copy ugly stuff :)
Uh, sorry.  No problem.
In general, you -need- a device node for the interrupt controller. It
will be made mandatory by the new code.
I know.  There is a fully defined node for that in my
device tree already.
You'll have to provide proper
interrupt informations in your device-tree (it's easy, really).
It's there.
If you get that right, it will be very easy to "just work" with my new
code.
I'll send that to the list too for reference
just to make sure we are in sync here.
quoted
+	/* Alloc mpic structure and per isu has 16 INT entries. */
+	mpic1 = mpic_alloc(OpenPIC_PAddr,
+			MPIC_PRIMARY | MPIC_WANTS_RESET | MPIC_BIG_ENDIAN,
+			16, MPC86xx_OPENPIC_IRQ_OFFSET, 0, 250,
+			mpc86xx_hpcn_openpic_initsenses,
+			sizeof(mpc86xx_hpcn_openpic_initsenses),
+			" MPIC     ");
+	BUG_ON(mpic1 == NULL);
+
+	/* 48 Internal Interrupts */
+	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 0, OpenPIC_PAddr + 0x10200);
+	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 1, OpenPIC_PAddr + 0x10400);
+	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 2, OpenPIC_PAddr + 0x10600);
I haven't looked in detail at your memory map, but do you need separate
ISUs ? They seem to be quite close together to me... Also, you should
invent properties in the mpic node for some of those things, like
big-endian (like apple does) indicating it's a big endian openpic,
etc... If you manage to get close enough to spec & common usage, you
might not even need your own init function at all in the future.
OK.  We'll work in that direction, but incrementally.
quoted
+	/* 16 External interrupts */
+	mpic_assign_isu(mpic1, 3, OpenPIC_PAddr + 0x10000);
That looks like you used ISUs in order to "re-order" them... why ?
Heck if I know.  We'll have to ask around some here... :-)
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_PEX
+	mpic_setup_cascade(MPC86xx_IRQ_EXT9, i8259_irq_cascade, NULL);
+	i8259_init(0, I8259_OFFSET);
+#endif
+}
Cascade handling is changing with my genirq port. It will be easy to
adapt though. Same comments howveer, you should have a device-tree node
for the 8259 (under an ISA bridge, those shall really be in the
device-tree). In general, on-board bridges should be in the device-tree,
only slots or standardly routed child PCI devices need not.
Can you send me an example?
All of the above shall be in the device-tree.
Yes, eventually.  But not yet...  We're working on
this with other folks like Kumar, and Monta Vista,
and other folks.
quoted
+static void __init
+mpc86xx_hpcn_setup_arch(void)
+{
+	struct device_node *np;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	phys_addr_t mcm_paddr;
+	void *mcm_vaddr = NULL;
+	unsigned long vaddr;
+#endif
+
+	if (ppc_md.progress)
+		ppc_md.progress("mpc86xx_hpcn_setup_arch()", 0);
+
+	np = of_find_node_by_type(NULL, "cpu");
+	if (np != 0) {
+		unsigned int *fp;
+
+		fp = (int *)get_property(np, "clock-frequency", NULL);
+		if (fp != 0)
+			loops_per_jiffy = *fp / HZ;
+		else
+			loops_per_jiffy = 50000000 / HZ;
+		of_node_put(np);
+	}
The above looks dodgy... powerpc uses the timebase frequency for delays
anyway, lpj will be initialized by the bogomips code, and should but
unused mostly nowadays anyway.
Uh, you want I should rip it out, boss? :-)
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_PEX
+	for (np = NULL; (np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "pci")) != NULL;)
+		add_bridge(np);
+
+	ppc_md.pci_swizzle = common_swizzle;
+	ppc_md.pci_map_irq = mpc86xx_map_irq;
+	ppc_md.pci_exclude_device = mpc86xx_exclude_device;
+#endif
I'm not sure I like this CONFIG_PEX (in general). Just use CONFIG_PCI
for now all over the place. PCI-E has it's own binding that we don't
quite respect yet but will do and all of that will be in the
device-tree. However, as far as the kernel is concerned, this is all
under CONFIG_PCI.
But I think we are looking for independent PCI/PCI-E options
to be independently configurable still...?
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+  	/* Release Core 1 in boot holdoff */
+	mcm_paddr = get_immrbase() + MPC86xx_MCM_OFFSET;
+	mcm_vaddr = ioremap(mcm_paddr, MPC86xx_MCM_SIZE);
+
+	vaddr = (unsigned long)mcm_vaddr +  MCM_PORT_CONFIG_OFFSET;
+	out_be32((volatile unsigned *)vaddr, CPU_ALL_RELEASED);
+	smp_ops = &smp_8641_ops;
+#endif
+}
Instead of ifdef's, just do a mpc86xx_smp_init() and put it somewhere
with the other SMP things in the file that contains them (and remove the
#ifdef's there too, just only build the file if CONFIG_SMP is set).
OK, I catch your drift, but if the file is missing and
there is a hard call to  mpc86xx_smp_init() here, how is
that resolved?  Is mpc86xx_smp_init #defined empty when
compiled non-SMP then?  Like in the header file:

    #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
        #define mpc86xx_smp_init()
    #endif
quoted
+void
+mpc86xx_hpcn_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
+{
+	uint pvid, svid, phid1;
+	uint memsize = total_memory;
+
+	pvid = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);
+	svid = mfspr(SPRN_SVR);

+	seq_printf(m, "Vendor\t\t: Freescale Semiconductor\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "Machine\t\t: MPC86xx HPCN Board\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "PVR\t\t: 0x%x\n", pvid);
+	seq_printf(m, "SVR\t\t: 0x%x\n", svid);
The PVR is probably a duplicate and the SVR should be added to per-cpu
info instead.
I confess, I am not sure what you mean here.  Could you
clarify this a bit for me, or point to an example perhaps?

Thanks for you feedback!

jdl

Re: [PATCH 2/10 v2] Add the MPC8641 HPCN platform files.

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2006-06-09 22:07:40

quoted
Cascade handling is changing with my genirq port. It will be easy to
adapt though. Same comments howveer, you should have a device-tree node
for the 8259 (under an ISA bridge, those shall really be in the
device-tree). In general, on-board bridges should be in the device-tree,
only slots or standardly routed child PCI devices need not.
Can you send me an example?
I'll try to dig something. Power3 at least has MPIC<->8259 cascade, as
do some IBM blades when running bare metal kernels.
quoted
The above looks dodgy... powerpc uses the timebase frequency for delays
anyway, lpj will be initialized by the bogomips code, and should but
unused mostly nowadays anyway.
Uh, you want I should rip it out, boss? :-)
Well, in any case it's bogus... your loops_per_jiffies is generally not
your processor frequency... I might be close on some CPUs and not on
others (it was double of it on early G4s for example), it may also
depend if things like BTIC are enabled.

I think you may just rip that out. Just check it doesn't break
anything :)
quoted
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_PEX
+	for (np = NULL; (np = of_find_node_by_type(np, "pci")) != NULL;)
+		add_bridge(np);
+
+	ppc_md.pci_swizzle = common_swizzle;
+	ppc_md.pci_map_irq = mpc86xx_map_irq;
+	ppc_md.pci_exclude_device = mpc86xx_exclude_device;
+#endif
I'm not sure I like this CONFIG_PEX (in general). Just use CONFIG_PCI
for now all over the place. PCI-E has it's own binding that we don't
quite respect yet but will do and all of that will be in the
device-tree. However, as far as the kernel is concerned, this is all
under CONFIG_PCI.
But I think we are looking for independent PCI/PCI-E options
to be independently configurable still...?
Well, if you want to separately configure a given PCI-E bridge, then do
a CONFIG_MPC86xx_PCIE or something like that, but in general, PCI-E
support _is_ the same as PCI support as far as the kernel is concerned.
 
quoted
quoted
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+  	/* Release Core 1 in boot holdoff */
+	mcm_paddr = get_immrbase() + MPC86xx_MCM_OFFSET;
+	mcm_vaddr = ioremap(mcm_paddr, MPC86xx_MCM_SIZE);
+
+	vaddr = (unsigned long)mcm_vaddr +  MCM_PORT_CONFIG_OFFSET;
+	out_be32((volatile unsigned *)vaddr, CPU_ALL_RELEASED);
+	smp_ops = &smp_8641_ops;
+#endif
+}
Instead of ifdef's, just do a mpc86xx_smp_init() and put it somewhere
with the other SMP things in the file that contains them (and remove the
#ifdef's there too, just only build the file if CONFIG_SMP is set).
OK, I catch your drift, but if the file is missing and
there is a hard call to  mpc86xx_smp_init() here, how is
that resolved?  Is mpc86xx_smp_init #defined empty when
compiled non-SMP then?  Like in the header file:

    #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
        #define mpc86xx_smp_init()
    #endif
Well, you could keep a #ifdef around the call, or you can define it as a
weak empty function
quoted
quoted
+void
+mpc86xx_hpcn_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
+{
+	uint pvid, svid, phid1;
+	uint memsize = total_memory;
+
+	pvid = mfspr(SPRN_PVR);
+	svid = mfspr(SPRN_SVR);

+	seq_printf(m, "Vendor\t\t: Freescale Semiconductor\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "Machine\t\t: MPC86xx HPCN Board\n");
+	seq_printf(m, "PVR\t\t: 0x%x\n", pvid);
+	seq_printf(m, "SVR\t\t: 0x%x\n", svid);
The PVR is probably a duplicate and the SVR should be added to per-cpu
info instead.
I confess, I am not sure what you mean here.  Could you
clarify this a bit for me, or point to an example perhaps?
Well, the generic cpuinfo code already displays the PVR for each CPU and
you have a per-cpu hook you can use to display the SVR.

Re: [PATCH 2/10 v2] Add the MPC8641 HPCN platform files.

From: Segher Boessenkool <hidden>
Date: 2006-06-10 13:52:12

quoted
quoted
Cascade handling is changing with my genirq port. It will be easy to
adapt though. Same comments howveer, you should have a device- 
tree node
for the 8259 (under an ISA bridge, those shall really be in the
device-tree). In general, on-board bridges should be in the  
device-tree,
only slots or standardly routed child PCI devices need not.
Can you send me an example?
I'll try to dig something. Power3 at least has MPIC<->8259 cascade, as
do some IBM blades when running bare metal kernels.
On the blades, the 8259 isn't cascaded to the MPIC.  And we disable
it completely anyway ;-)


Segher
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help