[PATCH 10/10 v2] Document I2C_MPC option for 86xx too.

Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <redacted>

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
index d6d4494..fbeae82 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig

@@ -252,12 +252,12 @@ config I2C_POWERMAC
 	  will be called i2c-powermac.
 
 config I2C_MPC
-	tristate "MPC107/824x/85xx/52xx"
+	tristate "MPC107/824x/85xx/52xx/86xx"
 	depends on I2C && PPC32
 	help
 	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
 	  built-in I2C interface on the MPC107/Tsi107/MPC8240/MPC8245 and
-	  MPC85xx family processors. The driver may also work on 52xx
+	  MPC85xx/MPC8641 family processors. The driver may also work on 52xx
 	  family processors, though interrupts are known not to work.
 
 	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module

Hi Jon,

Please add a paragraph explaining what the patch does. It will be used
as the git commit message.

Maybe leave 52xx at the end, as it seems to be special?

 	depends on I2C && PPC32
 	help
 	  If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
 	  built-in I2C interface on the MPC107/Tsi107/MPC8240/MPC8245 and
-	  MPC85xx family processors. The driver may also work on 52xx
+	  MPC85xx/MPC8641 family processors. The driver may also work on 52xx
 	  family processors, though interrupts are known not to work.
 
 	  This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module

This isn't very consistent, you first say 86xx as if several chips were
supported, then only list the MPC8641. Also, "MPC85xx family" made
sense but "MPC8641 family" doesn't.

When fixed, do you expect me to take that patch, or will it be merged
through the powerpc git tree?

-- 
Jean Delvare