Hi everybody,
I'm trying to bring up the two ethernet ports on a LXT973 dual-PHY chip. I've
declared two FCC platform devices, which are detected and handled by the
driver/net/fs_enet driver. My issue comes from MDIO support.
The LXT973 has a single MDIO port which answers to two addresses, one for each
PHY. The MDC and MDIO lines are connected to GPIO pins (no PHY interrupt), so
I'm using the bitbang MDIO driver. I've declared a MPC82xx_MDIO_BB platform
device, and set bus_id to "0:00" for both FCC ethernet devices. The first
ethernet device works fine, but the second complains that the PHY is already
in use.
As the PHY read/write accesses are protected by the bus->mdio_lock, I thought
about declaring a second MDIO platform device using the same I/O pins as the
first. Does anybody knows any problem I could run into using that approach ?
Is there a better method to handle the LXT973 MDIO ?
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide.
Best regards,
Laurent Pinchart
From: Wojciech Kromer <hidden> Date: 2006-05-30 09:26:20
I'm sucesfully using this chip with denx.de 2.4.25 kernel and single
MDIO port.
You need to change auto PHY-addr detection method. By default it
detects both PHYs on same addr.
Hi,
once again, posting to a mailing list helped me solving my problem. It should
have been obvious that the MDIO bus is really a bus, and can as such support
several devices. The issue was that the drivers/net/fs_enet driver set
bus->phy_mask to ~0x9, and the LXT973 uses addresses 0 and 1. Address 1 thus
never got probed. What's the reason for probing addresses 0 and 3 only ?
Laurent Pinchart
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:28:48 +0200
Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi,
once again, posting to a mailing list helped me solving my problem. It should
have been obvious that the MDIO bus is really a bus, and can as such support
several devices. The issue was that the drivers/net/fs_enet driver set
bus->phy_mask to ~0x9, and the LXT973 uses addresses 0 and 1. Address 1 thus
never got probed. What's the reason for probing addresses 0 and 3 only ?
The reason is obvious: bitbang read of PHY id with not-existent PHY, does not return expected (0, iirc), that confuse mdio bus device-driver bound (it assumes error and returns -1), and prevents from probing other phys. So, as that seems to be a "feature" on CPM2 only, we are working that around specifying phy_mask to prevent probing inexistent phys w/over bitbang thing.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly
From: Andy Fleming <hidden> Date: 2006-05-31 09:39:45
On May 30, 2006, at 09:22, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006 11:28:48 +0200
Laurent Pinchart [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Hi,
once again, posting to a mailing list helped me solving my
problem. It should
have been obvious that the MDIO bus is really a bus, and can as
such support
several devices. The issue was that the drivers/net/fs_enet driver
set
bus->phy_mask to ~0x9, and the LXT973 uses addresses 0 and 1.
Address 1 thus
never got probed. What's the reason for probing addresses 0 and 3
only ?
The reason is obvious: bitbang read of PHY id with not-existent
PHY, does not return expected (0, iirc), that confuse mdio bus
device-driver bound (it assumes error and returns -1), and prevents
from probing other phys. So, as that seems to be a "feature" on
CPM2 only, we are working that around specifying phy_mask to
prevent probing inexistent phys w/over bitbang thing.
Hopefully, this isn't being set in the driver, but is set in the
board code, instead. This is a board-specific setting.
Andy