Anyone back-ported fs_enet to 2.4? Possible?

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion? 

Bye,
Antonio.

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion? 

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

quoted

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

I need this fs_enet to support both FECs on a MPC875, is fs_enet suitable? Do 
you know if there is a different driver that can be used?

Bye,
Antonio.

On Monday 06 March 2006 20:12, Antonio Di Bacco wrote:

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:

quoted

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

quoted

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

I need this fs_enet to support both FECs on a MPC875, is fs_enet suitable? Do 
you know if there is a different driver that can be used?

Bye,
Antonio.

fs_enet is the improved version of fec_8xx.


Pantelis

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

quoted

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

Hi,

I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or 
is it a standalone driver for the FECs?

Thank you,
Antonio.

On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:28:03 +0100
Antonio Di Bacco [off-list ref] wrote:

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:

quoted

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

quoted

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

Hi,

I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or 
is it a standalone driver for the FECs?

fs_enet is the replacement of the fec_8xx... Well iirc early versions of fs_enet were functional and support 2.4 - search them around the list
At least, those patches could make you a clue what needs to be done to keep 2.4 compatibility...

Thank you,
Antonio.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

-- 
Sincerely, 
Vitaly

On Monday 06 March 2006 20:28, Antonio Di Bacco wrote:

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:29, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:

quoted

On Monday 06 March 2006 17:17, antonio.dibacco wrote:

quoted

Hi,

anyone back ported fs_enet to 2.4? Is it feasible in your high opinion?

Bye,
Antonio.

The original patches of fec_8xx did.

Try to get a hold of them.

Pantelis

Hi,

I saw a fec_8xx folder under drivers/net/, is this driver used by fs_enet or 
is it a standalone driver for the FECs?

Thank you,
Antonio.

it is a standalone driver.