2 messages, 2 authors, 2005-11-14 · open the first message on its own page
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2005-11-14 23:04:00
Guys, what's going on here. Why haven't we removed asm-ppc/page.h? When I build ARCH=powerpc I get asm-powerpc/page.h, which doesn't build on 85xx since page_to_virt is missing. Any reason we are keeping around asm-ppc/page.h and causing this confusion? - kumar
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2005-11-14 23:47:54
My original patch removed it, so Paulus must have kept if for some good reason. asm-powerpc/page.h probably should have page_to_virt, I'm not sure why I took it out :? cheers On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:01, Kumar Gala wrote:
Guys, what's going on here. Why haven't we removed asm-ppc/page.h? When I build ARCH=powerpc I get asm-powerpc/page.h, which doesn't build on 85xx since page_to_virt is missing. Any reason we are keeping around asm-ppc/page.h and causing this confusion? - kumar
-- Michael Ellerman IBM OzLabs email: michael:ellerman.id.au inmsg: mpe:jabber.org wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person