RE: [RFC][PATCH] [1/2] 8xx platform definitions

3 messages, 2 authors, 2005-08-19 · open the first message on its own page

RE: [RFC][PATCH] [1/2] 8xx platform definitions

From: Schaefer-Hutter, Peter <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-19 13:10:19 

Hello!

The last hunk in this patch looks a bit strange to me:
quoted hunk
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_sys.c

  [ ... ]

+		.mask 		=3D 0x00000000,
+		.value 		=3D 0x00000000,
+	},
+};
@@ -101,6 +105,22 @@ extern unsigned char __res[];

struct pt_regs;

+enum ppc_sys_devices {
Seems a bit inbetween is missing...

Best regards,

  Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Vitaly Bordug [mailto:vbordug@ru.mvista.com]=20
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 2:44 PM
To: Kumar Gala
Cc: linuxppc-embedded list; Schaefer-Hutter, Peter
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] [1/2] 8xx platform definitions

This is preliminary version of 8xx platform definitions. Currently sys=20
section contains only MPC885 and MPC866. Working example of=20
board-specific setup will follow.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <redacted>

--=20
Sincerely,
Vitaly

Re: [RFC][PATCH] [1/2] 8xx platform definitions

From: Vitaly Bordug <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-19 13:14:44 

Schaefer-Hutter, Peter wrote:
Hello!

The last hunk in this patch looks a bit strange to me:
quoted
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/ppc/syslib/mpc8xx_sys.c

 [ ... ]

+		.mask 		= 0x00000000,
+		.value 		= 0x00000000,
+	},
+};
@@ -101,6 +105,22 @@ extern unsigned char __res[];

struct pt_regs;

+enum ppc_sys_devices {

Seems a bit inbetween is missing...
It's OK, just the default match for the list.


-- 
Sincerely,
Vitaly

Re: [RFC][PATCH] [1/2] 8xx platform definitions

From: Vitaly Bordug <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-19 13:31:56 

Strange but one hunk header is missing in original patch.
Here's it again.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Bordug <redacted>

-- 
Sincerely,
Vitaly
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help