3 messages, 3 authors, 2005-08-06 · open the first message on its own page
From: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@gmail.com>
Date: 2005-08-02 13:58:15
Hi Marcelo While the idea of allocating console buffers from dpram is sound, the initial implementation didn't actually work :) The following patch fixes it (tested and booted on 2.6.13-rc4). Regards Pantelis -------------------------------------------------------------- Signed-Off-By: Pantelis Antoniou <redacted>
From: Marcelo Tosatti <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-05 20:40:37
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:09:45PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
Hi Marcelo While the idea of allocating console buffers from dpram is sound, the initial implementation didn't actually work :) The following patch fixes it (tested and booted on 2.6.13-rc4).
OK thanks Panto. Despite my limited knowledge here, Vitaly's merged patch looks fine. I suppose someone (Kumar?) is going to send it upstream now?
From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-06 03:11:25
On Aug 5, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 07:09:45PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:quoted
Hi Marcelo While the idea of allocating console buffers from dpram is sound, the initial implementation didn't actually work :) The following patch fixes it (tested and booted on 2.6.13-rc4).OK thanks Panto. Despite my limited knowledge here, Vitaly's merged patch looks fine. I suppose someone (Kumar?) is going to send it upstream now?
I plan on this, after we test it on 8560. - kumar