[PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

STALE7697d

5 messages, 3 authors, 2005-07-13 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

From: Guillaume Autran <hidden>
Date: 2005-07-12 14:22:29

Fix for a race condition when a task gets preempted by another task
while executing the destroy_context(...) in a FEW_CONTEXTS environment.
mm->context == NO_CONTEXT but the context_map may indicate all contexts
are in use.
The solution to this problem is to disable kernel preemption while
destroying a MMU context.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Autran <redacted>

---

diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-06-17 15:48:29.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-07-05 08:58:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
 */
static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+	preempt_disable();
	if (mm->context != NO_CONTEXT) {
		clear_bit(mm->context, context_map);
		mm->context = NO_CONTEXT;
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@
		atomic_inc(&nr_free_contexts);
#endif
	}
+	preempt_enable();
}

static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,

Re: [PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

From: Eugene Surovegin <hidden>
Date: 2005-07-12 16:39:23

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:23:51AM -0400, Guillaume Autran wrote:
quoted hunk
Fix for a race condition when a task gets preempted by another task
while executing the destroy_context(...) in a FEW_CONTEXTS environment.
mm->context == NO_CONTEXT but the context_map may indicate all contexts
are in use.
The solution to this problem is to disable kernel preemption while
destroying a MMU context.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Autran <redacted>

---

diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-06-17 15:48:29.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-07-05 08:58:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
*/
static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+	preempt_disable();
	if (mm->context != NO_CONTEXT) {
		clear_bit(mm->context, context_map);
		mm->context = NO_CONTEXT;
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@
		atomic_inc(&nr_free_contexts);
#endif
	}
+	preempt_enable();
}

static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
Could you explain, why this patch is needed?

AFAIK, destroy_context() is only called from switch_mm(), which in 
turn is called from schedule() with preemption already disabled. If 
not, IMHO we have bigger problems, and "fixing" destroy_context() will 
only hide such problems.

-- 
Eugene

Re: [PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

From: Guillaume Autran <hidden>
Date: 2005-07-12 18:27:52

Eugene, destroy_context(..) can be called from other place outside of 
the scheduler and switch_mm(...). See mmdrop(...) for example.
In many of those cases, the task will run with preemption enable.

Guillaume.


Eugene Surovegin wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:23:51AM -0400, Guillaume Autran wrote:
 
quoted
Fix for a race condition when a task gets preempted by another task
while executing the destroy_context(...) in a FEW_CONTEXTS environment.
mm->context == NO_CONTEXT but the context_map may indicate all contexts
are in use.
The solution to this problem is to disable kernel preemption while
destroying a MMU context.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Autran <redacted>

---

diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-06-17 15:48:29.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-07-05 08:58:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
*/
static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+	preempt_disable();
if (mm->context != NO_CONTEXT) {
	clear_bit(mm->context, context_map);
	mm->context = NO_CONTEXT;
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@
	atomic_inc(&nr_free_contexts);
#endif
}
+	preempt_enable();
}

static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,

   
Could you explain, why this patch is needed?

AFAIK, destroy_context() is only called from switch_mm(), which in 
turn is called from schedule() with preemption already disabled. If 
not, IMHO we have bigger problems, and "fixing" destroy_context() will 
only hide such problems.

 
-- 
=======================================
Guillaume Autran
Senior Software Engineer
MRV Communications, Inc.
Tel: (978) 952-4932 office
E-mail: gautran@mrv.com
======================================= 

Re: [PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

From: Eugene Surovegin <hidden>
Date: 2005-07-12 18:45:17

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:29:04PM -0400, Guillaume Autran wrote:
Eugene, destroy_context(..) can be called from other place outside of 
the scheduler and switch_mm(...). See mmdrop(...) for example.
In many of those cases, the task will run with preemption enable.
Ahh, OK, you're right. Maybe it's worth mentioning in the patch 
description :).

-- 
Eugene

Re: [PATCH] ppc32: fix destroy_context() race condition

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2005-07-13 00:11:38

On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:23 -0400, Guillaume Autran wrote:
Fix for a race condition when a task gets preempted by another task
while executing the destroy_context(...) in a FEW_CONTEXTS environment.
mm->context == NO_CONTEXT but the context_map may indicate all contexts
are in use.
The solution to this problem is to disable kernel preemption while
destroying a MMU context.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Autran <redacted>
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
quoted hunk
---

diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-06-17 15:48:29.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/mmu_context.h	2005-07-05 08:58:46.000000000 -0400
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@
 */
static inline void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
+	preempt_disable();
	if (mm->context != NO_CONTEXT) {
		clear_bit(mm->context, context_map);
		mm->context = NO_CONTEXT;
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@
		atomic_inc(&nr_free_contexts);
#endif
	}
+	preempt_enable();
}

static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,



Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help