3 messages, 2 authors, 2005-03-25 · open the first message on its own page
From: Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-25 21:21:00
what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the latest stock 2.6.x release. what's the status on patches that were submitted against the bk tree? have they been pushed upstream? etc, etc. rday
From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-25 21:52:13
On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the latest stock 2.6.x release.
I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything. If I'm submitting a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree just to be that little more up to date. -- Dan
From: Robert P. J. Day <hidden>
Date: 2005-03-25 22:13:16
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Dan Malek wrote:
On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:quoted
what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on 8xx? for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the latest stock 2.6.x release.I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything. If I'm submitting a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree just to be that little more up to date.
i just downloaded the 2.6.11-5 kernel source and was a bit nonplussed to discover that "8xx" wasn't in the list of choices for processor, until i noticed in the Kconfig file that 8xx depends on "BROKEN". oh, my. :-) live and learn. rday