Hi Paul,
Pls. commit this patch, its needed for MPC5200 Can
Regards
Andrey Volkov
Signed-off-by: Andrey Volkov <redacted>
--
ChangeSet@1.2159, 2005-03-09 15:05:37+03:00, avolkov@varma-el.com
ocp_ids.h:
New number for onboard CANbus devs.
ocp_ids.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h--- a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#define OCP_FUNC_RGMII 0x00D3
#define OCP_FUNC_TAH 0x00D4
#define OCP_FUNC_SEC2 0x00D5 /* Crypto/Security 2.0 */
+#define OCP_FUNC_CAN 0x00D6 /* CAN bus device */
/* Network 0x0200 - 0x02FF */
#define OCP_FUNC_EMAC 0x0200
Is this for 2.6? If so, 5200 needs to be moved to using the new driver=20=
model and platform devices. Take a look at support for MPC85xx or=20
marvell (mv64x60) as examples.
- kumar
On Mar 9, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
Hi Paul,
Pls. commit this patch, its needed for MPC5200 Can
Regards
Andrey Volkov
Signed-off-by: Andrey Volkov <redacted>
--
ChangeSet@1.2159, 2005-03-09 15:05:37+03:00, avolkov@varma-el.com
=A0=A0 ocp_ids.h:
=A0=A0=A0=A0 New number for onboard CANbus devs.
=A0 ocp_ids.h |=A0=A0=A0 1 +
=A0 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
=A0 #define OCP_FUNC_RGMII=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =
0x00D3
=A0 #define OCP_FUNC_TAH=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0x00D4
=A0 #define OCP_FUNC_SEC2 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0x00D5=A0 /* =
Crypto/Security 2.0 */
+#define OCP_FUNC_CAN=A0=A0 =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0x00D6=A0 /* CAN =
bus device */
=A0 /* Network 0x0200 - 0x02FF */
=A0 #define OCP_FUNC_EMAC =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 0x0200
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Hi Kumar:
Is this for 2.6? Oh sorry, certainly for 2.6 (Sylvain's kernel more precisely).
But since, Sylvain not maintainer of ocp_ids.h, so I send
this patch to Paul (who create it, am I right?).
If so, 5200 needs to be moved to using the new driver model and platform devices. Take a look at support for MPC85xx or marvell (mv64x60) as examples.
- kumar
Kumar, please, more cleanly, what did you want to say? If you told about
board_ocp[] in lite5200.c (platform specific). Then yes, I use it, but not mpc5200.c
--
Andrey
On Mar 9, 2005, at 6:20 AM, Andrey Volkov wrote:
quoted
Hi Paul,
Pls. commit this patch, its needed for MPC5200 Can
Regards
Andrey Volkov
Signed-off-by: Andrey Volkov <redacted>
--
ChangeSet@1.2159, 2005-03-09 15:05:37+03:00, avolkov@varma-el.com
ocp_ids.h:
New number for onboard CANbus devs.
ocp_ids.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -Nru a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h
--- a/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/ocp_ids.h 2005-03-09 15:07:51 +03:00
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@
#define OCP_FUNC_RGMII 0x00D3
#define OCP_FUNC_TAH 0x00D4
#define OCP_FUNC_SEC2 0x00D5 /* Crypto/Security 2.0 */
+#define OCP_FUNC_CAN 0x00D6 /* CAN bus device */
/* Network 0x0200 - 0x02FF */
#define OCP_FUNC_EMAC 0x0200
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
Andrey Volkov wrote:
Hi Kumar:
quoted
Is this for 2.6?
Oh sorry, certainly for 2.6 (Sylvain's kernel more precisely).
But since, Sylvain not maintainer of ocp_ids.h, so I send
this patch to Paul (who create it, am I right?).
quoted
If so, 5200 needs to be moved to using the new driver model and platform devices. Take a look at support for MPC85xx or marvell (mv64x60) as examples.
- kumar
Kumar, please, more cleanly, what did you want to say? If you told about
board_ocp[] in lite5200.c (platform specific). Then yes, I use it, but not mpc5200.c
No, what he said is that MPC5200 needs to be moved to use the platform bus driver model.
I'll post the patch doing just that on Monday along with PCI and sparse clean-ups. (Unless something goes wrong ...)
Sylvain
Sylvain,
Thanks, the i2c driver that you used on the OCP side should work for=20
you on the platform device side as well. Also, do you plan on using=20
the ppc_sys stuff for this? Hopefully yes.
- kumar
On Mar 9, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Munaut wrote:
Andrey Volkov wrote:
quoted
Hi Kumar:
>
>> Is this for 2.6?=A0
quoted
> Oh sorry, certainly for 2.6 (Sylvain's kernel more precisely).
> But since, Sylvain not maintainer of ocp_ids.h, so I send
> this patch to Paul (who create it, am I right?).
>
>> If so, 5200 needs to be moved to using the new driver model and
quoted
quoted
platform devices.=A0 Take a look at support for MPC85xx or marvell
(mv64x60) as examples.
>>
>> - kumar
>
> Kumar, please, more cleanly, what did you want to say? If you told=20=
about
> board_ocp[] in lite5200.c (platform specific). Then yes, I use it,=20=
but
quoted
not mpc5200.c
>
No, what he said is that MPC5200 needs to be moved to use the =
platform
bus driver model.
I'll post the patch doing just that on Monday along with PCI and =
sparse
clean-ups. (Unless something goes wrong ...)
=A0=A0=A0 Sylvain