RE: "I2C" versus "IIC"

From: VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) <hidden>
Date: 2004-10-13 20:18:32

-----Original Message-----
From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces@ozlabs.org=0D
[mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of=0D
Eugene Surovegin
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:34 PM
To: Robert P. J. Day
Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list
Subject: Re: "I2C" versus "IIC"
=0D
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:26:23PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
quoted
=0D
  i was just about to rename some of my variables and macros to be=0D
consistent with what i *thought* was the standard nomenclature of=0D
"IIC" as opposed to "I2C".  just checked include/asm-ppc,=0D
and grepped=0D
quoted
for case-insensitive instances of both strings ... oh, god.=0D
 there's=0D
quoted
really no preferred usage, is there?
=0D
Philips' documentation uses I2C, not IIC, so I guess this is=0D
_official_ name of the _bus_.
=0D
Some vendors (like IBM in their 4xx parts) use IIC to name=0D
I2C _interface_ to distinguish it from I2C _bus_ (they=0D
specifically mention this in the chip manual).
=0D
For example, in the corresponding 4xx driver I used "iic"=0D
because it was written for IBM IIC _interface_.
=0D
--
Eugene.

Just to mess with your minds... I2C is a trademark of Philips
Electronics N.V. so that is probably not the best choice from a
legalistic point of view.

gvb



******************************************
The following messages are brought to you by the Lawyers' League of
IdioSpeak:

******************************************
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain=
 confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the=
 individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to=
 legal privilege.  If you have received this e-mail in error you should=
 notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from=
 your system and notify your system manager.  Please do not copy it for any=
 purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person.  The views or=
 opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do=
 not necessarily represent those of the company.  The recipient should=
 check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses.  The=
 company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or=
 indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.
******************************************
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help