RE: "I2C" versus "IIC"
From: VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE) <hidden>
Date: 2004-10-13 20:18:32
-----Original Message----- From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces@ozlabs.org=0D [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of=0D Eugene Surovegin Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:34 PM To: Robert P. J. Day Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list Subject: Re: "I2C" versus "IIC" =0D On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:26:23PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:quoted
=0D i was just about to rename some of my variables and macros to be=0D consistent with what i *thought* was the standard nomenclature of=0D "IIC" as opposed to "I2C". just checked include/asm-ppc,=0Dand grepped=0Dquoted
for case-insensitive instances of both strings ... oh, god.=0Dthere's=0Dquoted
really no preferred usage, is there?=0D Philips' documentation uses I2C, not IIC, so I guess this is=0D _official_ name of the _bus_. =0D Some vendors (like IBM in their 4xx parts) use IIC to name=0D I2C _interface_ to distinguish it from I2C _bus_ (they=0D specifically mention this in the chip manual). =0D For example, in the corresponding 4xx driver I used "iic"=0D because it was written for IBM IIC _interface_. =0D -- Eugene.
Just to mess with your minds... I2C is a trademark of Philips Electronics N.V. so that is probably not the best choice from a legalistic point of view. gvb ****************************************** The following messages are brought to you by the Lawyers' League of IdioSpeak: ****************************************** The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain= confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the= individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to= legal privilege. If you have received this e-mail in error you should= notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from= your system and notify your system manager. Please do not copy it for any= purpose, or disclose its contents to any other person. The views or= opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do= not necessarily represent those of the company. The recipient should= check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The= company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or= indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email. ******************************************