Re: PCI scanning and devices initialization
From: Stefano Gaiotto <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-20 11:30:49
Thanks Sylvain,
I examinated board schematics and I found that pin "IDSEL" of the bridge
PCI/PCMCIA (PCI1410) in wired (at least in the schematics...) to line AD12
of data/address bus. (What's device address? 12? or 2? or 16?)
With the help of the hardware boys I want now to chek signal integrity
Regards,
Stefano
Sylvain Munaut [off-list ref] on 18/08/2004 14:54:43
To: Stefano Gaiotto <redacted>,
"linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org"
[off-list ref]
cc:
Subject: Re: PCI scanning and devices initialization
Stefano Gaiotto wrote:
Dear colleagues, I'm trying to use a device connected to a PCI bus, more exactly a PCI/PCMCIA bridge with u-boot-1.1.1 and Linux (2.4.24 and 2.6.8) in a board with MPC8270. Both u-boot and Linux, during scanning procedure show me only the PCI bridge [1057/18c0] but I can't see the devices connected to the bus. I'm a novice with PCI bus and I'm not sure the board is good (is the first prototype) and so I'd like to know if scanning procedure should tell me
the
devices connected or I have to do some device initialization before I can see them during scanning. I suppose I should see them during scanning and then initialise them via PCI bus. If my assumption is true, shall I suppose my hardware is not good? Or anything else?
Hi Yes, there may be something wrong with your hardware. I'm not familiar with the MPC8270 PCI code but your devices should show up during scan. At the PCI init, PCI devices don't yet have an address, so the host detects them using configuration cycles. Theses uses a different addressing scheme, using each address line as a kind of "chip select". So the devices know the host is "talking" to it just by looking at it's IDSEL line going asserted. If on your board the IDSEL isn't wired properly then it won't work. Hopefully if that's the case, you can just wire it by hand, it's not a high speed signal. Also, I've come accross some simple FPGA implementation of PCI devices that just didn't respond to config ... Sylvain PS: I'm not a PCI expert and that's just my understanding. There is probably a lot of things that can go wrong. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/