On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:10:22AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:

On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 10:12:15AM +0000, Mark Powell wrote:

quoted

Davey wrote:

quoted

Some time ago Stefan and I had reported that both ethernet interfaces
cannot work well together. Sorry I have lost all old mails when I
reinstall my computer. We have find that this problem is caused by
that the base address of eht1 is wrong set. Follow by my patch for
linux-2.4.22 and linux-2.4.23. I have test the patch and it work well.

shouldn't that just be:

This is the right way to do it, we can't put that other hack in the
kernel.  If somebody verifies this patch hen we can get it in.

Matt, I checked old-OCP version of ibm405ep.c and indeed it had
EMAC1_BASE there. Obviously this is a typo introduced during
conversion to new OCP.

I checked these definitions when Stefan first reported the problem
but failed to notice this :-(.

Eugene.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/