RE: Lost+Found directory (was: self image)

From: ARIBAUD Albert <hidden>
Date: 2003-12-11 09:39:39

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
quoted
How come the lost+found directory is large, or even has a
single entry to begin with? I thought it was used by fsck
to collect file data lost due to file system corruption
over time; so in a freshly built embedded image, there
shouldn't be any of that. Did I miss something?
When the filesystem is created (by mke2fs) special care is  taken  to
create a big directory that allows for many entries to be reconnected
without  need  to  grow  the directory which could be dangerous on an
already corrupted filesystem. Have a look:

[...]

to "blow up" the lost+found/ directory to allow  for  a  sufficiently
large   number   of   directory   entries.  Today  mke2fs  does  this
automagically (and people forget why it needs to be done).
Count me out of there: I didn't have the faintest idea about it to
begin with, let alone forget that idea. :)

However, I was dumb not to think of risking corruption while fsck-ing
the filesystem. :)

Thank you wolfgang for your explanation!

Albert.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help