From: Wolfgang Denk <hidden> Date: 2003-11-12 09:49:09
In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
quoted
We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about i2c-algo-5xxx.h
instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
...
What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the outside (non-PPC)
world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too generic name...
Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
[There is already i2c-algo-8xx.[ch]...]
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
Perl already has an IDE. It's called Unix.
-- Tom Christiansen in 375bd509@cs.colorado.edu
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about i2c-algo-5xxx.h
instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
...
quoted
What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the outside (non-PPC)
world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too generic name...
Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
i2c-algo-m5xxx.c, like the original?
[There is already i2c-algo-8xx.[ch]...]
I know. And it may be too generic, too...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Gabriel Paubert <hidden> Date: 2003-11-12 11:41:14
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:59:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
quoted
In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
quoted
quoted
We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about
i2c-algo-5xxx.h instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
...
quoted
What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the
outside (non-PPC) world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too generic
name...
Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
i2c-algo-m5xxx.c, like the original?
Hmmm, dont't repeated x have a tendency to trigger spam filters
(especially the dumbest ones)?
Why not 5nnn or 5xyz?
Gabriel
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:59:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
quoted
In message [off-list ref] you wrote:
quoted
quoted
We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about i2c-algo-5xxx.h
instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
...
quoted
What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the
outside (non-PPC) world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too
generic name...
Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
i2c-algo-m5xxx.c, like the original?
Hmmm, dont't repeated x have a tendency to trigger spam filters
(especially the dumbest ones)?
Why not 5nnn or 5xyz?
i2c-algo-m5x00.c? (or i2c-algo-m5<censored>.c :-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/