Hi Tom,
config.in.diff adds two missing '$' for config variables in
arch/ppc/config.in and the two other patches update the ocp definitions
for the stb4xxx and stbx25xx CPUs, so they can be built again. I used
linuxppc_2_4_devel, but they are needed for linuxppc-2.4, too.
Any idea why my changes to config.in were visible with bk difftool but
not with bk diffs? It's the first time I tried to use bk for creating
patches and I really don't like it. :)
Regards,
Andreas
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:04:49AM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Hi Tom,
config.in.diff adds two missing '$' for config variables in
arch/ppc/config.in and the two other patches update the ocp definitions
for the stb4xxx and stbx25xx CPUs, so they can be built again. I used
linuxppc_2_4_devel, but they are needed for linuxppc-2.4, too.
Applied. Does this mean you have the HW and can test things?
Any idea why my changes to config.in were visible with bk difftool but
not with bk diffs? It's the first time I tried to use bk for creating
patches and I really don't like it. :)
I don't know, I always use bk diffs. Perhaps you didn't do a 'bk edit'
before hand?
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 19:17, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:04:49AM +0200, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
quoted
Hi Tom,
config.in.diff adds two missing '$' for config variables in
arch/ppc/config.in and the two other patches update the ocp definitions
for the stb4xxx and stbx25xx CPUs, so they can be built again. I used
linuxppc_2_4_devel, but they are needed for linuxppc-2.4, too.
Applied. Does this mean you have the HW and can test things?
Thanks!
Yes, I have a set-top-box using the stb4500. I don't have an stbx25xx
yet, but there are or will be some interesting boxes on the market using
it.
I found two more bugs in linuxppc-2.4:
ppc405_wdt.c is missing, but it is available as a config option.
embed_config.c contains an #endif below #include <asm/io.h> without a
matching #if.
Unfortunately I can't send patches at the moment because my harddisk
died partially this morning...
Btw, thanks for applying the dbox2 patches! Will the watchdog code be
merged in before 2.4.23, too?
Regards,
Andreas
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/