On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:06:27PM +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
quoted
quoted
Random... lockups, oopses, sig11... but nothing useful because is happens
in random places. Ok, so the answer is no. Maybe the hw is faulty. It's
the only kernel I used on this mac.
Can you monitor cpu temp somehow? I had this once when a cpu fan would
barely spin.
Slightly off-topic: I've always wanted to have a memory-cache checker
kerneld that ran continuously in the background.
More off-topic. I've always wanted to have an on-line, background fsck
checker running continuously. I've had problems where a journalling
FS would think the FS was fine, log journal clean, but in fact, the fs
had slowly accumulated errors over many months due to ?? faulty
electronics ??. Biting the bullet and spending half a day on fsck
would reveal the problem; but that's an unhappy way to do things.
I guess i've got this jones for systems that run perfectly reliably
perfectly securely all the time ...
--linas
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On 28-Aug-2003 linas@austin.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 10:06:27PM +0200, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Random... lockups, oopses, sig11... but nothing useful because is happens
in random places. Ok, so the answer is no. Maybe the hw is faulty. It's
the only kernel I used on this mac.
Can you monitor cpu temp somehow? I had this once when a cpu fan would
barely spin.
I cannot monitor the tempeature directly because AFAIK that feature is
not available on 7455. The g4fan driver by Samuel Rydh says the temp.
is always around 59C. But I don't think this is the cause because I also
tried to keep the fans at full speed (~50C) with same results.
Slightly off-topic: I've always wanted to have a memory-cache checker
kerneld that ran continuously in the background.
More off-topic. I've always wanted to have an on-line, background fsck
checker running continuously. I've had problems where a journalling
FS would think the FS was fine, log journal clean, but in fact, the fs
had slowly accumulated errors over many months due to ?? faulty
electronics ??.
Small bugs, more likely. All journalling fs are still beta.
Bye.
Giuliano.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/