Re: Ethernet PHY chip discovery not working on 855T with 971/972 chips

Dear Pantelis,

in message [off-list ref] you wrote:

quoted

quoted

IIRC the last time we such discussions simply nothing  happened:  see
for example to code for dp_alloc / dp_free that was submitted several
times.

google knows nothing of this, can you give a pointer into the thread
please?  Thanks.

I was the one that sent the patches (search for dpalloc).

I was referring to a much older implementation  of  this  feature.  I
sent it to Tom nearly two years ago:

	Subject: Re: Modifications to linuxppc_2_4_devel
	From: Wolfgang Denk [off-list ref]
	Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:57:30 +0200
	To: Tom Rini [off-list ref]

The patch in question was named "PATCH-006-dpfree+uart".


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

--
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd@denx.de
Ever try. Ever fail. No matter. Try again. Fail again.  Fail  better.
                                                        -- S. Beckett

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:58:05AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

Dear Pantelis,

in message [off-list ref] you wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

IIRC the last time we such discussions simply nothing  happened:  see
for example to code for dp_alloc / dp_free that was submitted several
times.

google knows nothing of this, can you give a pointer into the thread
please?  Thanks.

I was the one that sent the patches (search for dpalloc).

I was referring to a much older implementation  of  this  feature.  I
sent it to Tom nearly two years ago:

	Subject: Re: Modifications to linuxppc_2_4_devel
	From: Wolfgang Denk [off-list ref]
	Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:57:30 +0200
	To: Tom Rini [off-list ref]

The patch in question was named "PATCH-006-dpfree+uart".

I really wish I had looked into making mutt keep a copy of sent mail a
lot sooner.  I don't suppose you have a copy of my reply to that as
well?  I suspect it was either "Can you break the uart stuff out from
the dpfree stuff" and you didn't, or "This is large and intrusive and
I'd feel better if I could make Dan Malek look at it".

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/