4 messages, 3 authors, 2003-05-16 · open the first message on its own page
From: Tom Guilliams <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-15 03:30:38
Anyone know why the BOOT_TARGET define for "pImage" in arch/ppc/Makefile was taken out? Are we not going to support the build rule for U-Boot/PPCBoot anymore other than building it manually (gzip vmlinux then use "mkimage"). Thanks in advance, Tom ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-15 18:59:53
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0700, Tom Guilliams wrote:
Anyone know why the BOOT_TARGET define for "pImage" in arch/ppc/Makefile was taken out? Are we not going to support the build rule for U-Boot/PPCBoot anymore other than building it manually (gzip vmlinux then use "mkimage").
Probably a bad merge. Wasn't there a patch / request a while back to update things (or just add it for 2.5? I forget) that never got back to me. Anyhow, I'll try and put this back next week (finals week this week) and see if I can get it up to Marcelo, provided someone else can verify that it works right. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: David Müller (ELSOFT AG) <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-16 07:49:43
Hello Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0700, Tom Guilliams wrote:quoted
Anyone know why the BOOT_TARGET define for "pImage" in arch/ppc/Makefile was taken out? Are we not going to support the build rule for U-Boot/PPCBoot anymore other than building it manually (gzip vmlinux then use "mkimage").Probably a bad merge. Wasn't there a patch / request a while back to update things (or just add it for 2.5? I forget) that never got back to me. Anyhow, I'll try and put this back next week (finals week this week) and see if I can get it up to Marcelo, provided someone else can verify that it works right.
This patch adds support for PPCBoot and U-Boot (PPCBoot's successor). Dave
From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2003-05-16 21:24:07
On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 09:49:43AM +0200, "David M?ller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
Hello Tom Rini wrote:quoted
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0700, Tom Guilliams wrote:quoted
Anyone know why the BOOT_TARGET define for "pImage" in arch/ppc/Makefile was taken out? Are we not going to support the build rule for U-Boot/PPCBoot anymore other than building it manually (gzip vmlinux then use "mkimage").Probably a bad merge. Wasn't there a patch / request a while back to update things (or just add it for 2.5? I forget) that never got back to me. Anyhow, I'll try and put this back next week (finals week this week) and see if I can get it up to Marcelo, provided someone else can verify that it works right.This patch adds support for PPCBoot and U-Boot (PPCBoot's successor).
And I again repeat: http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/8358/2002/11/0/10241415/ -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/