That patch doesn't do anything but move a line break. Is that really
what you meant to do?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Mark Rakes <hidden> Date: 2003-05-19 16:25:37
whoops. the le16_to_cpu() isn't there at all in the code.
trying to learn bk and keep the width under 80 was a bad combo.
real patch should look like:
diff -Nru a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Mon May 19 09:24:11 2003+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Mon May 19 09:24:11 2003
That patch doesn't do anything but move a line break. Is that really
what you meant to do?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
From: Mark Rakes <hidden> Date: 2003-05-20 19:07:10
OK. final version of the patch. this one even works for large tag
values.
Sorry for all the confusion.
-mark
diff -Nru a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Fri May 16 17:00:24 2003+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c Fri May 16 17:00:24 2003
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden> Date: 2003-05-21 22:10:00
Mark Rakes writes:
OK. final version of the patch. this one even works for large tag
values.
I suggest you send the patch to the e1000 driver maintainer. It can
go in linuxppc_2_4_devel but that is a dead end for it really.
Paul.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/