In message <001001c25e1e$c9c33ac0$7301a8c0@zhongqx> you wrote:
I want to use FEC(100M) and SCC1(10M) interface,but they can not work together.
They can.
eth0: CPM ENET Version 0.2 on SCC1, 00:d0:93:00:12:34
eth1: FEC ENET Version 0.2, FEC irq 3, MII irq 4, addr 00:d0:93:80:12:34
Please be aware that both interfaces use the same MAC address. This
is ok as long as you don;t try to connect bioth to the same subnet.
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
Freeing unused kernel memory: 40k init
init started: BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.07.18-17:16+0000) multi-call SIOCADDRT: Net
work is unreachable
******(What reason ? when this message output?)
Well, it makes little sense to guess how you ifconfig'ed the
interfaces, please provide more information.
My bet is that you tired to run both ethernet ports in the same
network, and that you're experiencing a conflict caused by two
identical MAC addresses.
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
"I find this a nice feature but it is not according to the documen-
tation. Or is it a BUG?" "Let's call it an accidental feature. :-)"
- Larry Wall in [off-list ref]
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Denk" <redacted>
To: "zhongqx" <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: Why FEC and SCC1 can not work at the same time?
Sir ,
Thank you for your help,but I disagree with your in some point.
First, I did not use the same MAC address, eth0 is 00:d0:93:00:12:34 and eth1 is 00:d0:93:80:12:34 ,one is 00:12::34 and one is 80:12:34,are they in the same?
Second , I did not use both ethernet port to connect the same network ,one is 192.168.1.X and other is 192.168.2.X ,netmask is 255.255.255.0.
The third, I ifconfiged my interface in /etc/inid.d/rcS file,my rcS file is:
#!/bin/sh
mount -t proc proc /proc
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.221 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.198 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add default gw 192.168.2.1 eth1
while [ 1 ]
do
/bin/sh
done
My inittab file is:
# /etc/inittab: init configuration.
# The default runlevel.
#hw id:3:initdefault:
# Boot-time system configuration/initialization script.
#si::sysinit:/etc/init.d/rcS
::sysinit:/etc/init.d/rcS
Route information is here:
# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
# ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:93:00:12:34
inet addr:192.168.2.221 Bcast:192.168.2.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:41 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:3677 (3.5 kb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Base address:0x3c00
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:93:80:12:34
inet addr:192.168.1.198 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Base address:0xe00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
#
Thank you very much again,hope to hear from you soon!
In message <001001c25e1e$c9c33ac0$7301a8c0@zhongqx> you wrote:
quoted
I want to use FEC(100M) and SCC1(10M) interface,but they can not work together.
They can.
quoted
eth0: CPM ENET Version 0.2 on SCC1, 00:d0:93:00:12:34
eth1: FEC ENET Version 0.2, FEC irq 3, MII irq 4, addr 00:d0:93:80:12:34
Please be aware that both interfaces use the same MAC address. This
is ok as long as you don;t try to connect bioth to the same subnet.
quoted
VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem).
Freeing unused kernel memory: 40k init
init started: BusyBox v0.60.2 (2002.07.18-17:16+0000) multi-call SIOCADDRT: Net
work is unreachable
******(What reason ? when this message output?)
Well, it makes little sense to guess how you ifconfig'ed the
interfaces, please provide more information.
My bet is that you tired to run both ethernet ports in the same
network, and that you're experiencing a conflict caused by two
identical MAC addresses.
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
"I find this a nice feature but it is not according to the documen-
tation. Or is it a BUG?" "Let's call it an accidental feature. :-)"
- Larry Wall in [off-list ref]
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
This looks like it may be a simple network issue. You have eth0 on the
192.168.1.X subnet. The subnet mask is set to 255.255.255.0 meaning it can
see all other 192.168.1.X IP's. eth1 is set to 192.168.2.X subnet with the
same subnet mask so he only sees other IP's on the 192.168.2.X subnet. Your
gateway is 192.168.2.1 for eth1. Is this gateway able to reach both
networks? Have you tried making these on the same network (192.168.1.X) and
trying to ping them?
Rick Hunnicutt
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
[mailto:owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org]On Behalf
Of zhongqx
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Why FEC and SCC1 can not work at the same time?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Denk" <redacted>
To: "zhongqx" <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 4:10 AM
Subject: Re: Why FEC and SCC1 can not work at the same time?
Sir ,
Thank you for your help,but I disagree with your in some point.
First, I did not use the same MAC address, eth0 is
00:d0:93:00:12:34 and eth1 is 00:d0:93:80:12:34 ,one is
00:12::34 and one is 80:12:34,are they in the same?
Second , I did not use both ethernet port to connect the same
network ,one is 192.168.1.X and other is 192.168.2.X ,netmask
is 255.255.255.0.
The third, I ifconfiged my interface in /etc/inid.d/rcS
file,my rcS file is:
#!/bin/sh
mount -t proc proc /proc
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
ifconfig eth0 192.168.2.221 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.198 netmask 255.255.255.0
route add default gw 192.168.2.1 eth1
while [ 1 ]
do
/bin/sh
done
My inittab file is:
# /etc/inittab: init configuration.
# The default runlevel.
#hw id:3:initdefault:
# Boot-time system configuration/initialization script.
#si::sysinit:/etc/init.d/rcS
::sysinit:/etc/init.d/rcS
Route information is here:
# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric
Ref Use Iface
192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0
0 0 eth0
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0
0 0 eth1
# ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:93:00:12:34
inet addr:192.168.2.221 Bcast:192.168.2.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:41 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:3677 (3.5 kb) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Base address:0x3c00
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:D0:93:80:12:34
inet addr:192.168.1.198 Bcast:192.168.1.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Base address:0xe00
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
#
Thank you very much again,hope to hear from you soon!
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/