The new power management code is killing the 405GP
on-chip ethernet (no interrupts, no phy
communications, no packets).
If I comment out the body of ppc4xx_pm_init() in
ppc4xx_pm.c, ethernet works again.
I'm using the 2.4.19 kernel from
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel (CS 1.1114).
Armin, any comments?
Regards,
Brian Kuschak
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Brian Kuschak wrote:
The new power management code is killing the 405GP
on-chip ethernet (no interrupts, no phy
communications, no packets).
If I comment out the body of ppc4xx_pm_init() in
ppc4xx_pm.c, ethernet works again.
I'm using the 2.4.19 kernel from
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel (CS 1.1114).
Armin, any comments?
Regards,
Brian Kuschak
Brian,
That would be a bad thing. I will double check but I think that might
have been corrected in a later version. Try pulling a later BK tree.
Armin
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
akuster wrote:
Brian Kuschak wrote:
quoted
The new power management code is killing the 405GP
on-chip ethernet (no interrupts, no phy
communications, no packets).
If I comment out the body of ppc4xx_pm_init() in
ppc4xx_pm.c, ethernet works again.
I'm using the 2.4.19 kernel from
bk://ppc.bkbits.net/linuxppc_2_4_devel (CS 1.1114).
Armin, any comments?
Regards,
Brian Kuschak
Brian,
That would be a bad thing. I will double check but I think that might
have been corrected in a later version. Try pulling a later BK tree.
Armin
Brian,
I justed tried the latest BK and it worked fine
armin
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/