Re: [RFC/Patch] 4xx idle loop
From: Matthew Locke <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-24 19:50:15
From: Matthew Locke <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-24 19:50:15
akuster wrote:
I was going though some old 4xx kernels I have and found an implimentation of idle.c that had support for 4xx. I believe the reason it never made is out was the hacking we did to make it work. So I propose that we modify the kernel/Makefile to use ppc4xx_idel.o instead of idle.o when 4xx is configured. That way we have a clean implimentation for 4xx idle functions and not touch the generic ppc idle file. The function names would not change.
Rather than replace the whole idle loop, I would allow for sub-arch/processor specific code in the idle loop. Perhaps move the power_save routine into the platform code?
Armin
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/