ppc4xx_serial.c?

3 messages, 3 authors, 2002-02-14 · open the first message on its own page

ppc4xx_serial.c?

From: David Gibson <hidden>
Date: 2002-02-14 05:30:08

Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
defined.

--
David Gibson			| For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au	| solution which is simple, neat and
				| wrong.  -- H.L. Mencken
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ppc4xx_serial.c?

From: Armin <hidden>
Date: 2002-02-14 08:06:01

Stefan Roese wrote:
quoted
Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
defined.
That was also my impression. It seems, that this file could be removed.

Stefan.



remnance from the intial release.

--armin


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: ppc4xx_serial.c?

From: Stefan Roese <hidden>
Date: 2002-02-14 08:46:06

Is arch/ppc/kernel/ppc4xx_serial.c of any relevance any more?  It
doesn't include any code unless CONFIG_DEBUG_BRINGUP is defined, and
it doesn't look like it would compile, let alone be called, if it was
defined.
That was also my impression. It seems, that this file could be removed.

Stefan.


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help