On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:32:08PM -0400, Josh Huber wrote:

Tom Rini [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

But the bi_recs in 2.5 won't look like 2.4.current.

bummer...can it not be changed in a compatible manner?

Not really.  In 2.4 we toss the bi_recs near the end of the kernel+BSS,
i _think_.  In 2.5 we want r<3 or 4 or so> to be a pointer to where
they are.  This is why we've been waiting until 2.5, we want to break
compatibility.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/