Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

6 messages, 4 authors, 2001-09-20 · open the first message on its own page

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Matt Porter <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-19 10:38:24

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"

results today (!?) in

drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

Has anyone else the same problem?
Yes.  Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder
source.mvista.com???
source.mvista.com is a mirror of ppc.bkserver.net.  I'm using
ppc.bkserver.net for now.

--
Matt Porter
MontaVista Software, Inc.
mporter@mvista.com

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-19 14:46:10

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
quoted
But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"

results today (!?) in

drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

Has anyone else the same problem?
Yes.  Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
Er, there's a problem?  I didn't know you could do a clone from the
http one, just the bk:// version.  I'll try updating the bk version
running on source later this afternoon.

bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
Did the http version ever work?

--
Tom

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Steven Scholz <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-19 14:58:38

Tom Rini wrote:
Er, there's a problem?  I didn't know you could do a clone from the
http one, just the bk:// version.  I'll try updating the bk version
running on source later this afternoon.

bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
Did the http version ever work?
Since I am sitting behind a proxy/firewall HTTP seems to be the only way
to get the sources.

I could clone the tree from http://ppc.bkserver.net. bk pull and bk
resync worked as well.
But bk:// and http:// should get me the same results, don't they?

Steven

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Steven Scholz <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-19 15:13:16

Er, there's a problem?  I didn't know you could do a clone from the
http one, just the bk:// version.  I'll try updating the bk version
running on source later this afternoon.

bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
Did the http version ever work?
Is it posible at all to use bk:// through a proxie server?
If so, please tell me how. Which Port?
The BitKeeper docs aren't exactly very detailed.

Cheers,

Steven

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Kenneth Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-19 16:43:38

Steven Scholz wrote:
quoted
Er, there's a problem?  I didn't know you could do a clone from the
http one, just the bk:// version.  I'll try updating the bk version
running on source later this afternoon.

bk://source.mvista.com/tree does work tho.
Did the http version ever work?
Is it posible at all to use bk:// through a proxie server?
If so, please tell me how. Which Port?
The BitKeeper docs aren't exactly very detailed.

Cheers,

Steven
Well I never got it to work and since I never read anything from anyone that
it works assumed it just was not implemented.

But now I did some more testing and it turns out that bk when using http://
thru a firewall really do need the port number part of the http_proxy env
variable or else it won't work.



--
Kenneth Johansson
Ericsson Business Innovation AB   Tel: +46 8 404 71 83
Viderögatan 3                     Fax: +46 8 404 72 72
164 80 Stockholm                  kenneth.johansson@inn.ericsson.se

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: BitKeeper and linuxppc_2_4_devel

From: Tom Rini <hidden>
Date: 2001-09-20 00:12:48

On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 03:38:24AM -0700, Matt Porter wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
quoted
But "bk clone http://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_devel linux/"

results today (!?) in

drainErrorMsg: Unexpected response:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN">

Has anyone else the same problem?
Yes.  Just noticed it yesterday...somebody will get it fixed.
Okay.  This specific problem has a simple cause.  source.mvista.com runs
an actual webserver.  So, if you're behind a strict proxy:
bk pull http://ppc.bkserver.net/tree_name
If there's enough interest and people affected willing to test, I'll
see if we can setup some automagic redirect, but I suspect this will
fail since data would still be on port 14360.
quoted
BTW which one has the most recent source: ppc.bkserver.net oder
source.mvista.com???
source.mvista.com is a mirror of ppc.bkserver.net.  I'm using
ppc.bkserver.net for now.
Okay.  Regarding the flakiness Matt noticed, I upgraded bk again, and
if you don't get something similar to this:
$ bk version
BitKeeper/Free version is bk-2.0pre3.1 20010918150405 for x86-glibc22-linux
Built by: lm@glibc22.bitmover.com
Built on: Tue Sep 18 10:48:28 PDT 2001

Go ahead and upgrade and try again.

--
Tom

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help