Re: PPC bk repos reorg

For now use the old port numbers those should still work while I go poke
at this.

On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:43:36AM -0300, Gavin Hemphill wrote:

Larry I just tried out the anonymous access using the new syntax and found that (of course) it won't work through our firewall.  I'd had a hole punched in the firewall to allow pull's etc. but it's
tied to port numbers.  Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this with the reorganized parents.
	G++

Larry McVoy wrote:

quoted

I'd like to keep the .com for commercial hosting in case anyone wants
to give us huge piles of money (yeah, right, but you never know).
But I could use

        bk://ppc@ppc.bkbits.net/linux_2_2 instead of
        bk://ppc@ppc.bkserver.net/linux_2_2

It's a whole 2 letters shorter.  If I can ever get bk.net/bk.com that's
the obvious thing but the chances of that are right up there with me
winning the lottery.  If anyone stumbles across a really short, approrpiate
domain, let me know.  The nicest thing sourceforge ever did for me is
to get sf.net :-)

Anyway, all of the above addresses currently point at the same place.
If you all say "bkbits" then I'll reserve bkbits.net for the hosting
service.  I'm a big fan of less is more and that's the shortest I could
find.

--
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

I can't even use the old way from work but I have done some testing with bk
from home in aticipation of the 4xx updates that has been RSN the last few
month.

The revtool is a really nice tool to find out what has changed and once I
figured out that I needed to also do a get command everything that I need
works. BUT one thing I did not like is the fact that a grep -r now catch not
only the source but also the file in the repository directory. Is there a way
to work with bk that the source is not in the same place as the bk files?


Larry McVoy wrote:

For now use the old port numbers those should still work while I go poke
at this.

On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 10:43:36AM -0300, Gavin Hemphill wrote:

quoted

Larry I just tried out the anonymous access using the new syntax and
found that (of course) it won't work through our firewall. I'd had a
hole punched in the firewall to allow pull's etc. but it's tied to
port numbers. Do you have any suggestions on how to handle this with
the reorganized parents.

--
Kenneth Johansson
Ericsson Business Innovation AB   Tel: +46 8 404 71 83
Viderögatan 3                     Fax: +46 8 404 72 72
164 80 Stockholm                  kenneth.johansson@inn.ericsson.se

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/