RE: kernel ftp ?
From: Zehetbauer Thomas <hidden>
Date: 2001-07-23 09:44:02
BitKeeper is commercial software and therefore not very like to succeed in the path of kernel devlopment. I think we've had this discussion a thousand times on lkml. The reasons are numerous even if BitKeeper is licensed for free to open source developers. Firstly it is unlikely to be distributed with your favourite linux distribution. You have to find and download the software first. Of course I agree that this is a problem of every third party software. As it is unlikely that a package or at least a binary for your favourite linux distribution is available it is a maintenance nightmare to track down library problems and do release upgrades or uninstall it. To start working with the software you will need to learn another set of commands, options and parameters. If are working on some not to be public changes you will have to buy BitKeeper or use a second source code control system. And finally if I encounter a problem at 3am in the morning there is no sourcecode to track it down, I will have to wait until the next day to call and pay for support. These are the main reasons I would definitely prefer CVS/FTP/rsync access to the kernel tree! Tom ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/