Re: How does one get physical address for iorempped window?

2 messages, 2 authors, 2001-02-19 · open the first message on its own page

Re: How does one get physical address for iorempped window?

From: Matt Porter <hidden>
Date: 2001-02-18 16:28:28

On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:58:59AM -0800, Subodh Nijsure wrote:
I know the physical address I should be writing to.

For debugging I was trying to print exact physical address where
write is happening .When I used virt_to_phys() on the addresse
ioremap() I was not getting back the original physical address.
Hence the question.
Well, the base problem is that virt_to_*/*_to_virt were only ever
intended to work on addresses mapped to system RAM.  See
Documentation/IO-mapping.txt.  Why not just store argument one to
ioremap to calculate the physical addresses you are working with
in virtual space?

--
Matt Porter
mmporter@home.com
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: How does one get physical address for iorempped window?

From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-02-19 17:59:10

Matt Porter wrote:
Well, the base problem is that virt_to_*/*_to_virt were only ever
intended to work on addresses mapped to system RAM.
I know.....But, even for someone like me that works with this
on a nearly daily basis it is sometimes confusing.  It's truly
easy to have one function that can tell you virt/phys/virt mappings,
other OS implementations have done that for years.  If you want
a "fast" RAM only mapping, use __pa()/__va(), they have been around
forever.  The virt_to_*/*_to_virt functions _should_ have become
something more generic, but they are just yet another macro name
for doing the same thing.  Now, we have gone of and created some pci_*
mapping functions, which are not at all useful for highly integrated
processors because their integrated features are not PCI devices.
Yet another set of functions for integrated processors?  I don't think so.

I think that requiring knowledge of the object attributes for a VM or
physical space so you can call the proper mapping or other management
functions is just a poor design.  If you know this information and
wish to take performance enhancement shortcuts, that's fine, but it
shouldn't be required.

I'm working on it........


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help