Re: do md5sums differ across architectures?

From
Kevin B. Hendricks <hidden>
Date
2001-02-22 16:03:45
Hi,

No, ftping in binary.

I am running textutils-2.0e6 rpm (the latest) from www.linuxppc.org which supplies
md5sum

I will check what I am running on Solaris.

hmm, I wonder which one is broken?

Thanks,

Kevin

On Thursday, February 22, 2001, at 10:49 AM, Ethan Benson wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:24:01AM -0500, Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
quoted
Hi,

I ran md5sum on a big bz2 archive on my ppc linux box and then
ftp'd it to my Sun Solaris 7 box at work.

I checked it with md5sum on that machine and it differed.

Okay I thought, a bad packet during upload.

So I tried again, same result.

I then passed back and forth (known good archives) and the md5sums
were different.

Okay, I thought maybe an endian issue but both Solaris Sparc and PPC
Linux are big endian.

Should these sums be different?
no, that would rather defeat the purpose of md5sum hashes.  one of
your md5sum programs is broken.

or perhaps you ftp'd in text mode instead of binary mode.

--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help