} It appears that the BitKeeper repository at bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
} has changed. What happened to the previous BK tree? Was it replaced with the
} 2.4.0 baseline?
Yup. The 5000 and 5001 trees are completely new. You need to reclone.
Sorry about the abrupt change, it mirrors the abrupt and poorly timed
appearance of 2.4.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Cort Dougan wrote:
} It appears that the BitKeeper repository at bk://bitkeeper.fsmlabs.com:5000
} has changed. What happened to the previous BK tree? Was it replaced with the
} 2.4.0 baseline?
Yup. The 5000 and 5001 trees are completely new. You need to reclone.
Sorry about the abrupt change, it mirrors the abrupt and poorly timed
appearance of 2.4.
Nice, I have a copy of the 2.3 tree with my own patches which are quite a
long list of changes and merges. Recloning is _not_ an option...
Fortunately I was still using copy of Linus tree in my own repositories
which I maintain personnally as my main development branch. I was
seriously considering switching to the fsmlabs bk trees, now it will never
happen, ever...
Gabriel.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/