Re: kernel mapping

3 messages, 3 authors, 2001-01-17 · open the first message on its own page

Re: kernel mapping

From: David Edelsohn <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-16 17:47:16

quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Dan Malek writes:
Dan> I have been experimenting with many different methods of using
Dan> the "large" page table sizes through the generic memory management
Dan> methods that already exist in the kernel.  I believe I can wrap
Dan> the concept of the pinned TLB entries into the same logic as BAT
Dan> register management on the bigger processors.  Hence, I call them
Dan> simulated BAT registers....the semantics aren't quite the same.

	Note that forthcoming 64-bit PowerPC chips from IBM utilize
multiple page sizes and no longer provide BAT registers.  "BAT register
management on the bigger processors" is a misnomer.

David

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: kernel mapping

From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-16 21:57:50

David Edelsohn wrote:
        Note that forthcoming 64-bit PowerPC chips from IBM utilize
multiple page sizes and no longer provide BAT registers.  "BAT register
management on the bigger processors" is a misnomer.
No problem...I'm preparing.......Thanks for the info.


	-- Dan

--

	I like MMUs because I don't have a real life.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: kernel mapping

From: Gabriel Paubert <hidden>
Date: 2001-01-17 10:51:22

On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, David Edelsohn wrote:
	Note that forthcoming 64-bit PowerPC chips from IBM utilize
multiple page sizes and no longer provide BAT registers.  "BAT register
management on the bigger processors" is a misnomer.
How is it implemented ?  Is there any documentation available on the web ?

	Regards,
	Gabriel.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help