On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
Mon, Jan 8, 2001, Tom Rini wrote:
quoted
2_4 is on the same port as where 2_3 used to be. 2_4 is once again working,
so everyone go and try that tree on your machine.
so what's on the rsync linuxppc_2_3 ?
No idea. It might be 2_4 it might not be. :)
(for those of us who still haven't had time to tangle with bk ;-)
and can I expect it to build?
what state does it represent?
(i.e. is it a continuation of the same tree - or a rebuild from the 2.4.0
final)
The 2_4 tree is building. If it's not building, report it here.
It represents what will someday get to Linus. Hopefully sooner rather than
later. It's a new tree which is the old tree. Cort made a new one, called
2_4 and I put all of our changes from 2_3 back in. It's based off of 2.4.0
final.
is there any point trying kernel.org 2.4.0 final? (or ac3 - which I pulled
last night)
No.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Iain Sandoe wrote:
quoted
(for those of us who still haven't had time to tangle with bk ;-)
and can I expect it to build?
what state does it represent?
(i.e. is it a continuation of the same tree - or a rebuild from the 2.4.0
final)
The 2_4 tree is building. If it's not building, report it here.
It represents what will someday get to Linus. Hopefully sooner rather than
later. It's a new tree which is the old tree. Cort made a new one, called
2_4 and I put all of our changes from 2_3 back in. It's based off of 2.4.0
final.
quoted
is there any point trying kernel.org 2.4.0 final? (or ac3 - which I pulled
last night)
It may help to create nightly diffs between Linus' 2.4.0 and linuxppc_2_4 and
put them on some FTP site. People still more like patches than bk :-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:54:00PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
It may help to create nightly diffs between Linus' 2.4.0 and linuxppc_2_4 and
put them on some FTP site.
bk help export
you want
bk export -tpatch
Cort's been using it for a year or more to send Linus patches.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Tom Rini wrote:
quoted
quoted
is there any point trying kernel.org 2.4.0 final? (or ac3 - which I pulled
last night)
It may help to create nightly diffs between Linus' 2.4.0 and linuxppc_2_4 and
put them on some FTP site. People still more like patches than bk :-)
^^^^
My sincere apologies for the people who may misunderstand what I was trying to
say. Bitkeeper is a fine tool!
But many people may prefer to download the (small?) patch to make plain 2.4.0
usable on PPC over downloading bk and the bk tree.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/