Re: [RFC] DMAsound 2.4.0-tx => 2.2.17 back-port.

3 messages, 3 authors, 2000-08-24 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC] DMAsound 2.4.0-tx => 2.2.17 back-port.

From: Iain Sandoe <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-24 16:30:29

Where is your backport (or rather patches against 2.4.0-testx) available?
The backport is on  http://www.drfruitcake.com/linux/linuxppc.html

I have not done a separate 2.4.0-test x patch.

The reason is that the code *is* the 2.4.0-testx code. (this was the point
of the back-port) with a few KERNEL_VERSION conditionals

So, if you want to use it on 2.4.0 all you should need to do is to replace
the files in drivers/sounds/dmasound with the ones from the back-port.

There are a few minor additions (DSP_SND_GETCAPS etc.).

If people want a 2.4.0 patch I'll do one... but it's been awful quiet
(s'cuse the pun).

I'm mostly working under 2.2.17 because of the flakiness of 2.4.0 (but, by
using the same code base, with the idea that any improvements will move
straight to 2.4.0)>

There are things in progress to sort out mixer abstraction issues with
different pmac models.  Wrestling with via-cuda :-( trying to read the i2c
bus (with some action but still some problems)..

and...
I've also been "underactive and out of touch" as well :-)

Iain.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: [RFC] DMAsound 2.4.0-tx => 2.2.17 back-port.

From: Michel D�nzer <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-24 16:36:52

Iain Sandoe wrote:
quoted
Where is your backport (or rather patches against 2.4.0-testx) available?
The backport is on  http://www.drfruitcake.com/linux/linuxppc.html

I have not done a separate 2.4.0-test x patch.
Sorry, I was referring to Henry Worth mentioning changes to the 2.4 code.

I'm mostly working under 2.2.17 because of the flakiness of 2.4.0 (but, by
using the same code base, with the idea that any improvements will move
straight to 2.4.0)>
BTW AFAIK Linus considers this coding style bloat. I also think that if the
new stuff would only be in 2.4, more people would probably use/test it and get
it more stable.


Two cents more,


Michel


--
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)  \  CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \   member of XFree86 and the DRI project

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: [RFC] DMAsound 2.4.0-tx => 2.2.17 back-port.

From: Henry Worth <hidden>
Date: 2000-08-24 19:46:10

On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Michel [iso-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
Iain Sandoe wrote:
quoted
quoted
Where is your backport (or rather patches against 2.4.0-testx) available?
The backport is on  http://www.drfruitcake.com/linux/linuxppc.html

I have not done a separate 2.4.0-test x patch.
Sorry, I was referring to Henry Worth mentioning changes to the 2.4
code.

No, just to the back-port, the kernel version macro is undefined
and there is a typo in a variable name.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help