[ANN] First latency test results for linuxPPC [2.2.17pre10-ben2]

2 messages, 2 authors, 2000-07-14 · open the first message on its own page

[ANN] First latency test results for linuxPPC [2.2.17pre10-ben2]

From: Iain Sandoe <hidden>
Date: 2000-07-13 23:54:41

Hi,

I've posted the results of Benno's latency tests applied to 2.2.17pre10-ben2
on LinuxPPC.

http://www.drfruitcake.com/linux/linuxppc.html

No big surprises - although the PPC /proc fs seems to be a little slower
than the x86 one...

Working on 2.4.0-test4 & thence to Andrew's patches on LinuxPPC...

ciao,
Iain.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: [linux-audio-dev] [ANN] First latency test results for linuxPPC [2.2.17pre10-ben2]

From: Roger Larsson <hidden>
Date: 2000-07-14 18:47:46

Iain Sandoe wrote:
Hi,

I've posted the results of Benno's latency tests applied to 2.2.17pre10-ben2
on LinuxPPC.

http://www.drfruitcake.com/linux/linuxppc.html

No big surprises - although the PPC /proc fs seems to be a little slower
than the x86 one...

Working on 2.4.0-test4 & thence to Andrew's patches on LinuxPPC...

ciao,
Iain.

Hi,

The green ticks on X11 test are interesting - something with a higher
prio than
the SCHED_FIFO max takes the processor away from it and runs for more
than 1 ms.

The only thing that can do that is interrupt routines / back handlers...
(try to find this one)

Disk read looks nice - others looks ...


/RogerL

--
Home page:
  http://www.norran.net/nra02596/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help