quik-1.3.1and 2.2.16_pmac-stable ?

3 messages, 2 authors, 2000-06-16 · open the first message on its own page

quik-1.3.1and 2.2.16_pmac-stable ?

From: Claus Enneper <hidden>
Date: 2000-06-16 16:08:05

hi,
I'm happy with a 2.2.15pre14, mol-patched on a PB3400, booting with
the help of quik-1.3.1-0a.ppc.rpm,

rsync'ed 2.2.16 two days ago, built it with the same config, but got
this error in OF:
DEFAULT CATCH!, Code=FFF00300 at   %SRR0: 0014B008  %SRR1: 00003070

any hints?

Thanks
Claus

--
Yours, ce

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: quik-1.3.1and 2.2.16_pmac-stable ?

From: Claus Enneper <hidden>
Date: 2000-06-16 23:05:41

PB3400

 >rsync'ed 2.2.16 two days ago, built it with the same config, but got
 >this error in OF:
 >DEFAULT CATCH!, Code=FFF00300 at   %SRR0: 0014B008  %SRR1: 00003070

hi,
in '/usr/src/linux-pmac-stable/arch/ppc/kernel/prom.c' line 431:
	/* Find the OF version */
	prom_op = call_prom(RELOC("finddevice"), 1, 1, RELOC("/openprom"));
	RELOC(prom_version) = 0;
	if (prom_op != (void*)-1) {
	    char model[64];
	    int sz;
	    sz = (int)call_prom(RELOC("getprop"), 4, 1, prom_op, RELOC("model"), model, 64);
	    if (sz > 0) {
		if ( strncmp(model,RELOC("IBM"),3) ) {
	    	    char *c;
		    for (c = model; *c; c++)
		        if (*c >= '0' && *c <= '9') {
			    RELOC(prom_version) = *c - '0';
			    break;
		        }
		} else
		    chrp = 1;
	    }
	}
	if (RELOC(prom_version) >= 3)
		prom_print(RELOC("OF Version 3 detected.\n"));

all (prom_version) have their RELOC, so that's not the point.
unfortunatly, I'm not able to make a diff to 2.2.15pre14 to see the difference.

Thanks for any other hint.
--
Yours, ce

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: quik-1.3.1and 2.2.16_pmac-stable ?

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <hidden>
Date: 2000-06-16 23:34:16

On Sat, Jun 17, 2000, Claus Enneper [off-list ref] wrote:
all (prom_version) have their RELOC, so that's not the point.
unfortunatly, I'm not able to make a diff to 2.2.15pre14 to see the
difference.

Ah, yes, it's a different issue. You should probably use a more recent
quik (2.0+) to work with recent kernels. Old quik doesn't like the new
kernel entry point (without the pseudo-xcoff hack).


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help