Thank's a lot for making this package. Did you manage to contact
Stephan? What about the apmd patch?
On testing, I'm out of business for a while, as the baby is being
visited by the doctor (faulty display).
Sergio
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Michael Schmitz <hidden> Date: 2000-05-23 18:09:41
Thank's a lot for making this package. Did you manage to contact
Stephan? What about the apmd patch?
Just what I needed to get half way up to speed with Debian packaging again
:-)
I've not had an answer from Stephan but I didn't give him any heads-up
either. The apmd patch seems to be included, it's enabled by the -a option
to pmud as far as I could see. The fifo (/etc/power/apm) is created
during installation, so all it should take is adding the -a to the
PMUD_FLAGS definition in /etc/default/power. I need to document this :-)
On testing, I'm out of business for a while, as the baby is being
visited by the doctor (faulty display).
Speedy recovery for the baby ...
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Stephan Leemburg <hidden> Date: 2000-05-24 07:11:27
on 23-05-2000 20:09, Michael Schmitz at
schmitz@zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de wrote:
quoted
Thank's a lot for making this package. Did you manage to contact
Stephan? What about the apmd patch?
Yes, thanks! If you wish I can pull it to my source-tree and also distribute
the debian package on every release...
Just what I needed to get half way up to speed with Debian packaging again
:-)
I've not had an answer from Stephan but I didn't give him any heads-up
either. The apmd patch seems to be included, it's enabled by the -a option
to pmud as far as I could see. The fifo (/etc/power/apm) is created
during installation, so all it should take is adding the -a to the
PMUD_FLAGS definition in /etc/default/power. I need to document this :-)
Yes, it's activated with the -a flag (see pmud --help for details). I need
to modify the manuals and /etc/power/apm. You must have a modified apm
program to use it however, as the 'standard' apm programs all read from
/proc/apm and this path is usually compile time determined...
--
Stephan
quoted
On testing, I'm out of business for a while, as the baby is being
visited by the doctor (faulty display).
From: Joseph Garcia <hidden> Date: 2000-05-24 07:31:23
Stephan Leemburg wrote:
Yes, it's activated with the -a flag (see pmud --help for details). I need
to modify the manuals and /etc/power/apm. You must have a modified apm
program to use it however, as the 'standard' apm programs all read from
/proc/apm and this path is usually compile time determined...
I also found this kind of annoying. And as far as I can tell, APM doesn't show
everything. This is why I wrote a plugin for GKrellM that, using PMUD, displays
battery status in a window. Its almost as good as Batmon, but smaller. I know
this works on Wallstreet, PDQ, and Lombard, and have untested code for other
systems. If you already used GKrellM, this is something to try. And I still
need testers for systems I don't have access to.
Are there any other PMU-savvy monitors out there?
Thanks.
--
Joseph P. Garcia jpgarcia@execpc.com jpgarcia@lidar.ssec.wisc.edu
CS Undergraduate Student Employee - Systems Programmer
University of Wisconsin - Madison UW Lidar Group
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Michael Schmitz <hidden> Date: 2000-05-24 09:18:48
quoted
quoted
Thank's a lot for making this package. Did you manage to contact
Stephan? What about the apmd patch?
Yes, thanks! If you wish I can pull it to my source-tree and also distribute
the debian package on every release...
That would make my job a lot easier. I still have some things to clean up
though (what subsection of the distribution; it's currently in base but
should rather go in admin like apmd; and the rc symlink generation)
I'll probably best leave xmouse out of the package; a tool to read the
mouse configuration via ADB on sleep and restore it on wakeup would be
nice to have instead.
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Michael Schmitz <hidden> Date: 2000-05-24 20:23:01
quoted
Yes, thanks! If you wish I can pull it to my source-tree and also distribute
the debian package on every release...
That would make my job a lot easier. I still have some things to clean up
though (what subsection of the distribution; it's currently in base but
should rather go in admin like apmd; and the rc symlink generation)
OK, there's a new version of the package on my FTP site, it handles the rc
symlinks itself now and has a pwrctl function added for the iBook and
Pismo models. It would be good to see how that works in practice when pmud
attempts to put the machine to sleep (due to low power). I force the
display backlight to 0 (off) and the disk to shut down (hdparm -Y) which
worked OK for me (took a few hda timeouts and such to recover from it). If
there's any other components that can be shut down from user space please
let me know (hdc would be another candidate if it's installed - is the
Pismo media bay or iBook CDROM at hdc?
I'll upload the package to unstable immediately. It won't go into potato
anymore but that shouln't be too bad. If someone on debian-powerpc
objects, please CC me, I'm not on that list yet.
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Michel D�nzer <hidden> Date: 2000-05-25 12:04:26
Michael Schmitz wrote:
OK, there's a new version of the package on my FTP site, it handles the rc
symlinks itself now and has a pwrctl function added for the iBook and
Pismo models.
Thanks, will test it.
It would be good to see how that works in practice when pmud attempts to put
the machine to sleep (due to low power).
When I tried to run snooze with the old version, it said 'function not
implemented' or similar - is this related?
is the Pismo media bay or iBook CDROM at hdc?
The DVD-ROM in my Pismo is hde.
Michel
--
Here I am! Now what are your other two wishes?
______________________________________________________________________________
Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper) \ CS student and free software enthusiast
Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc,i386) user \ member of XFree86, Team *AMIGA*, AUGS
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
From: Michael Schmitz <hidden> Date: 2000-05-25 20:25:36
quoted
It would be good to see how that works in practice when pmud attempts to put
the machine to sleep (due to low power).
When I tried to run snooze with the old version, it said 'function not
implemented' or similar - is this related?
That's the message. pmud tries to issue the sleep ioctl, which fails in
the kernel and generates that message (or the message was generated by the
pwrctl script, it's quiet now).
If you want to experiment a bit, try snooze and see if the disk stays off
until you force disk activity somehow. The screen should switch off as
well but can be re-lighted by the brightness buttons so you see what
you're typing.
If the disk stays off, and the machine cools down sufficiently you may
even attempt to close the lid (which will try a snooze as well). I can't
tell if that's safe with the remaining amount of power consumption though.
If the machine would get too hot with disk off and lid closed, we'll have
to force a shutdown on these machines as soon as the lid is closed, to
keep users from damaging their box.
quoted
is the Pismo media bay or iBook CDROM at hdc?
The DVD-ROM in my Pismo is hde.
OK, I'll add that to the sleep clause in the Core99 function.
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/