Re: Where to get Paul's tree [was Re: problem building 2.3.47: no macintosh.a file]
From: Dan Bethe <hidden>
Date: 2000-03-03 20:13:23
Hi guys. Does this mean that we've converted the linuxppc-dev source tree to Bitkeeeper? If so, is it suitable? Can we finally get rid of these multiple fractured personal trees maintained independantly by such esteemed studly hackerly gentlemen as Paul and BenH? And if so, can we please have an official detailed announcement and instructions on the use of Bitkeeper? If not, what is needed? Do we want a CVS tree in the meantime? Or shall we just leave it alone until the current final solution arrives in the form of Bitkeeper? Keep knockin em down, guys.
--- phandel@cise.ufl.edu wrote:On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Lou Langholtz wrote:quoted
I also don't actually know anymore where to get Paul's source tree.Paul's devel: rsync -auvz linuxcare.com.au::linux-pmac-devel /usr/src/linux-2.3-devel Bitkeeper devel: rsync -auvz hq.fsmlabs.com::linuxppc_2_3 /usr/src/linux-2.3-bit (Read about the bitkeeper tree: http://www.fsmlabs.com/linuxppcbk.html)
===== "Don't expect your own messiah; this neverworld which you desire is only in your mind." -- http://www.dreamtheater.net/songb4.htm#IV5 ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/