Re: the great state of the linuxppc-dev community
From: jeramy b smith <hidden>
Date: 2000-02-09 07:01:57
I agree with some of what Dan says although I would choose different words and a different focus. Development is not so much 'splintered' as it just has no 'center.' If you read the history of the ppc sources, you'll see that this is how it has always been. BUT, development is become more centralized out of mere evolution. For instance, here is a piece of 'voodoo' known only to a handful; the #mklinux channel on EFNet usually has 2 or more kernel developers on. Today I discovered that a kernel couldn't be built with having an asm-m68k include directory in your source tree. Instead of submitting a patch full of ifdefs to this mailing list, I just told Ben who was there and he added it to his tree. Eventually, this will wind up in Paul's. Sure, things are not as centralized as they could be. There is no linuxppc-kernel mailing list so that all new patches can be easily reviewed by peers and announcement for to-do lists can be posted. I'll set one up on my dedicated majordomo server but this would depend on whether the maintainers would go for it. In my opinion, to-do lists are the most needed thing. Many kernel development tasks such as cleaning up messy code and documentation could be handled by some of the wanna-be hackers (like me) while people like Ani, Ben, Paul, Cort, and Geert are writing drivers and merging new features. To-do lists would also give people who want to get in on the deeper development process an idea where they can start. Linux/PPC just needs a bit of small, easy to implement, non-annoying, project management. The maintainers do an awesome job based on the amount of help/time available but a little bit of centralization of communication could increase the amount of volunteers doing meaningful work. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/