Re: linux-2.3.37 / 2.3.18 / 2.2.13

3 messages, 3 authors, 2000-01-10 · open the first message on its own page

Re: linux-2.3.37 / 2.3.18 / 2.2.13

From: Robin O'Leary <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-10 21:10:47

On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 02:54:03PM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
The 2.2.xx kernels are certainly the most stable and recommended
if you are building products.  There is a 2.2.13 tar image on
ppc.kernel.org/embedded for 8xx processors.  I don't know when
some of the recent changes happened, but the generic 2.3.18
kernel has all of the 8xx changes.
Most recently (apart from trying the doomed 2.3.37) I have been using
2.3.18 (from ftp://linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu/pub/linuxppc/embedded) on
custom 860T hardware.  As you may have gathered from my earlier post
on 1999-11-29, all has not been going smoothly.  Although I have now
coaxed 2.3.18 as far as trying to load the initrd, it has been an uphill
struggle all the way and I still haven't got the compressed bootloader
going properly.  Could it be that my problems stem from using 2.3.18?

Robin O'Leary.
-- 
email: robin@equiinet.com  Equiinet Ltd., Innovation Centre, Singleton Park,
Tel.:  +44 1792 540008     Swansea  SA2 8PP, Wales, U.K.  51.6101N 3.9831W

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: linux-2.3.37 / 2.3.18 / 2.2.13

From: Dan Malek <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-10 22:40:21

Robin O'Leary wrote:

....  Although I have now
coaxed 2.3.18 as far as trying to load the initrd, it has been an uphill
struggle all the way and I still haven't got the compressed bootloader
going properly.  Could it be that my problems stem from using 2.3.18?

As I recall, the ram disk didn't work in 2.3.18.  There are some
general things that don't work in 2.3.18, so I bailed out and
updated 2.2.xx to get something stable.  Since 2.3.xx is now
in it's mid-30's (still younger than I :-), perhaps it is mature
enough that I should visit again and make sure the 8xx configuration
continues to work.


	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: linux-2.3.37 / 2.3.18 / 2.2.13

From: Alan Mimms <hidden>
Date: 2000-01-10 23:32:06

Dan, the lack of RAMDISK support is still on Alan/Linus's "must do" list
before 2.3.x can become 2.4.x.  That would seem to imply that the necessary
work has not been done.

a

On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Dan Malek wrote: > Robin O'Leary
wrote: >  > 
quoted
....  Although I have now
coaxed 2.3.18 as far as trying to load the initrd, it has been an uphill
struggle all the way and I still haven't got the compressed bootloader
going properly.  Could it be that my problems stem from using 2.3.18?

As I recall, the ram disk didn't work in 2.3.18.  There are some
general things that don't work in 2.3.18, so I bailed out and
updated 2.2.xx to get something stable.  Since 2.3.xx is now
in it's mid-30's (still younger than I :-), perhaps it is mature
enough that I should visit again and make sure the 8xx configuration
continues to work.


	-- Dan
-- 
Alan Mimms     Packet Engines, Inc.     Spokane, Washington [99214-0497]
  USA, Earth, Sol, Milky Way, The Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, U0
Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how popular it remains?
  -- Steven Wright?

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help