From: VALETTE Eric <hidden> Date: 1999-07-19 13:39:20
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. Canon CRF - Communication Dept
(___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
E-mail: valette@crf.canon.fr http://www.crf.canon.fr
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Matt Porter <hidden> Date: 1999-07-19 20:39:05
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, VALETTE Eric wrote:
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
--
Matt Porter
mmporter@home.com
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
--
Actually that is not true. Motorola has submitted changes to both Paul
and Cort that have not made it into vger. Last I know the sources in
vger would not boot on Motorola platforms other than Blackhawks and
Utahs.
I'd very much like to get the changes in.
Johnnie
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
Actually that is not true. Motorola has submitted changes to both Paul
and Cort that have not made it into vger. Last I know the sources in
vger would not boot on Motorola platforms other than Blackhawks and
Utahs.
Try putting 'em vs 2.3.x. I think right now the push is to fix all the
little annoyances/problems that we're stuck w/ in 2.2.x and move forward
in 2.3.x. Then backport things later on.
---
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: VALETTE Eric <hidden> Date: 1999-07-20 07:57:20
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Matt" == Matt Porter [off-list ref] writes:
Matt> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, VALETTE Eric wrote:
quoted
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Matt> Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
At least I did...
-- eric
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Neil Piercy <hidden> Date: 1999-07-20 17:40:53
----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Rini <redacted>
To: Johnnie Peters <redacted>
Cc: Matt Porter <redacted>; VALETTE Eric <redacted>;
[off-list ref]
Sent: 19 July 1999 23:47
Subject: Re: Is the vger 2.2 kernel branch dead
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Try putting 'em vs 2.3.x. I think right now the push is to fix all the
little annoyances/problems that we're stuck w/ in 2.2.x and move forward
in 2.3.x. Then backport things later on.
I thought 2.2.x was meant to be the stable branch and 2.3.x the dev ? It
seems strange to back-port fixes to known bugs in the stable branch from a
dev branch which is frequently broken - or do I misunderstand ? Stable
doesnt equal frozen in my book.
Neil
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Try putting 'em vs 2.3.x. I think right now the push is to fix all the
little annoyances/problems that we're stuck w/ in 2.2.x and move forward
in 2.3.x. Then backport things later on.
I thought 2.2.x was meant to be the stable branch and 2.3.x the dev ? It
seems strange to back-port fixes to known bugs in the stable branch from a
dev branch which is frequently broken - or do I misunderstand ? Stable
doesnt equal frozen in my book.
2.2.x is for obvious and correct stuff, important fixes and the like.
Some of the stuff no doubt belongs in 2.2.x. Other things I've seen go
past (Hotswap PCI) is most definatly a 2.3.x thing (IMHO) and might need
some work to be accepted by linus (as hotswap is a generic thing, but i
didn't look over that patch very well). Of course another problem is
making sure Cort or Paul actually sees the patch and doesn't accidently
just delete it. I know Cort gave some people who asked accounts on
linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu for patches, and I think there's a place anyone can
upload...
---
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Martin Costabel <hidden> Date: 1999-07-20 19:46:41
Tom Rini wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Neil Piercy wrote:
quoted
From: Tom Rini <redacted>
quoted
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Try putting 'em vs 2.3.x. I think right now the push is to fix all the
little annoyances/problems that we're stuck w/ in 2.2.x and move forward
in 2.3.x. Then backport things later on.
I thought 2.2.x was meant to be the stable branch and 2.3.x the dev ? It
seems strange to back-port fixes to known bugs in the stable branch from a
dev branch which is frequently broken - or do I misunderstand ? Stable
doesnt equal frozen in my book.
2.2.x is for obvious and correct stuff, important fixes and the like.
Some of the stuff no doubt belongs in 2.2.x. Other things I've seen go
past (Hotswap PCI) is most definatly a 2.3.x thing (IMHO) and might need
some work to be accepted by linus (as hotswap is a generic thing, but i
didn't look over that patch very well). Of course another problem is
making sure Cort or Paul actually sees the patch and doesn't accidently
just delete it. I know Cort gave some people who asked accounts on
linuxppc.cs.nmt.edu for patches, and I think there's a place anyone can
upload...
Is anyone in the PPC camp actually following the vger 2.3.x branch? I am
asking because since almost a month this branch hasn't compiled on my
ppc any more, due to some obvious bugs. Maybe it is better to wait until
the dust from that page-cache adventure has settled?
--
Martin
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Matt Porter <hidden> Date: 1999-07-21 16:20:42
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Matt Porter wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, VALETTE Eric wrote:
quoted
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
Actually that is not true. Motorola has submitted changes to both Paul
and Cort that have not made it into vger. Last I know the sources in
vger would not boot on Motorola platforms other than Blackhawks and
Utahs.
I'd very much like to get the changes in.
I was being facetious. Honestly, somebody is feeding me a major line of
crap. Cort claims to get no patches from Motorola, yet Johnnie claims to
be sending them in. Since my stuff is in Johnnie's repository, it's a
problem for me. Hopefully, this time things start going in cause if
not we'll have to find another route.
--
Matt Porter
mmporter@home.com
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
This is as we speak being fixed. Look at vger in the next
few days for the changes.
Johnnie
Matt Porter wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
quoted
Matt Porter wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, VALETTE Eric wrote:
quoted
I tried to upgrade here and no changes during one month!!!
As there still some important bugs in 2.2.10++, I wonder
why nothing happens???
Perhaps nobody has submitted any bug fixes?
Actually that is not true. Motorola has submitted changes to both Paul
and Cort that have not made it into vger. Last I know the sources in
vger would not boot on Motorola platforms other than Blackhawks and
Utahs.
I'd very much like to get the changes in.
I was being facetious. Honestly, somebody is feeding me a major line of
crap. Cort claims to get no patches from Motorola, yet Johnnie claims to
be sending them in. Since my stuff is in Johnnie's repository, it's a
problem for me. Hopefully, this time things start going in cause if
not we'll have to find another route.
--
Matt Porter
mmporter@home.com
This is Linux Country. On a quiet night, you can hear Windows reboot.
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: VALETTE Eric <hidden> Date: 1999-07-22 07:57:48
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Matt" == Matt Porter [off-list ref] writes:
Matt> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Matt> I was being facetious. Honestly, somebody is feeding me a major line of
Matt> crap. Cort claims to get no patches from Motorola, yet Johnnie claims to
Matt> be sending them in. Since my stuff is in Johnnie's repository, it's a
Matt> problem for me. Hopefully, this time things start going in cause if
Matt> not we'll have to find another route.
I was thinking Cort may be on vacation... If this is the case, It's bad
it has not been announced. Nevertheless, once again, the lack of transparency
for patch handling is *really* annoying...
I understand patches can be rejected. At least I would like to know why...
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. Canon CRF - Communication Dept
(___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
E-mail: valette@crf.canon.fr http://www.crf.canon.fr
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
Matt> On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Johnnie Peters wrote:
Matt> I was being facetious. Honestly, somebody is feeding me a major line of
Matt> crap. Cort claims to get no patches from Motorola, yet Johnnie claims to
Matt> be sending them in. Since my stuff is in Johnnie's repository, it's a
Matt> problem for me. Hopefully, this time things start going in cause if
Matt> not we'll have to find another route.
I was thinking Cort may be on vacation... If this is the case, It's bad
AFAIK Cort is not on vacation. He checks in patches at vger on a daily base.
it has not been announced. Nevertheless, once again, the lack of transparency
for patch handling is *really* annoying...
I understand patches can be rejected. At least I would like to know why...
Just saw this:
CVSROOT: /vger/u4/cvs
Module name: linux
Branch: linux_2_2
Changes by: cort@vger.rutgers.edu 99/07/21 21:49:46
Modified files:
arch/ppc : defconfig
arch/ppc/boot : Makefile misc.c
arch/ppc/kernel: i8259.c irq.c prep_pci.c prep_setup.c smp.c
Log message:
Changes for Moto SMP boards from Johnnie Peters
CVSROOT: /vger/u4/cvs
Module name: linux
Branch: linux_2_2
Changes by: cort@vger.rutgers.edu 99/07/21 21:52:26
Modified files:
include/asm-ppc: keyboard.h
Log message:
More MTX changes from Johnnie
CVSROOT: /vger/u4/cvs
Module name: linux
Branch: linux_2_2
Changes by: cort@vger.rutgers.edu 99/07/21 21:56:57
Modified files:
. : CREDITS
Log message:
Add Johnnie
Greetings,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be
Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/
Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
Geert> AFAIK Cort is not on vacation. He checks in patches at vger on a daily base.
So why did I get no single comment on patches I submitted?
The Prep IDE handling is broken...
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. Canon CRF - Communication Dept
(___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
E-mail: valette@crf.canon.fr http://www.crf.canon.fr
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
Geert> AFAIK Cort is not on vacation. He checks in patches at vger on a daily base.
So why did I get no single comment on patches I submitted?
The Prep IDE handling is broken...
Define "PReP IDE handling is broken" because it isn't broken on systems
that use only the legacy PIC. I only see breakage on MPIC Mot. systems
here with positive results on PowerStacks etc...
I assume you are referring to the MCP750 level inversion problem for one.
The other problem is how the pci-ide driver snags interrupt 16 from the
PIB config space on all Mot. Raven/Hawk boards as the IDE interrupt. I've
got patches for these things. They are not in the patch that Johnnie sent
in because there is an outstanding issue of the MTX IDE driver hanging on
the partition check that I would like to fix as well (even though nobody
should be using IDE if they paid for an MTX :).
--
Matt Porter Motorola Computer Group
matt_porter@mcg.mot.com CIBU Linux Support
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
Geert> AFAIK Cort is not on vacation. He checks in patches at vger on a daily base.
quoted
So why did I get no single comment on patches I submitted?
The Prep IDE handling is broken...
Matt> Define "PReP IDE handling is broken" because it isn't broken on systems
Matt> that use only the legacy PIC. I only see breakage on MPIC Mot. systems
Matt> here with positive results on PowerStacks etc...
No no. Ide Byte swapping is broken again for PREP machines and 2.2.10 kernel...
(same type of patch you've send months ago)...
*** ./arch/ppc/kernel/prep_setup.c~ Fri Jun 4 22:30:47 1999
Matt> I assume you are referring to the MCP750 level inversion problem for one.
This problem is MCP750 specific and I did submit a patch for it...
Matt> The other problem is how the pci-ide driver snags interrupt 16 from the
Matt> PIB config space on all Mot. Raven/Hawk boards as the IDE interrupt. I've
Matt> got patches for these things. They are not in the patch that Johnnie sent
Matt> in because there is an outstanding issue of the MTX IDE driver hanging on
Matt> the partition check that I would like to fix as well (even though nobody
Matt> should be using IDE if they paid for an MTX :).
Here is my patch for the via + ide...
Pease note that as IDE interrupt source can be assigned directly
at via level, the ultimate patche is in the via speciifc driver
as I did...
*** ./drivers/block/via82c586.c~ Fri Nov 13 19:29:44 1998
--- 82,106 ----
void ide_init_via82c586 (ide_hwif_t *hwif)
{
set_via_timings(hwif);
+ #ifdef __powerpc__
+ /*
+ * We are running in full DMA mode so we cannot use the PCI IRQ
+ * for both ide0 and ide1 (which would happen if the follwoing code
+ * was absent...)
+ *
+ * In theory we should go back and scan the PCI/ISA bridge PCI
+ * configuration register (function 0 while hwif->pci_dev is function 1)
+ * at offset 0x4a (IDE interrupt routing)
+ *
+ * The value below are the default value in the VIA doc...
+ */
+ if (!(strcmp(hwif->name, "ide0"))) {
+ hwif->irq = 14;
+ }
+ if (!(strcmp(hwif->name, "ide1"))) {
+ hwif->irq = 15;
+ }
+ #endif
+
}
*** ./drivers/block/ide-pci.c~ Mon Jan 25 06:54:35 1999
***************
*** 346,353 ****
for (port = 0; port <= 1; ++port) {
unsigned long base = 0, ctl = 0;
ide_pci_enablebit_t *e = &(d->enablebits[port]);
if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) || (tmp & e->mask) != e->val))
! continue; /* port not enabled */
if ((dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE || (dev->class & (port ? 4 : 1)) != 0) {
ctl = dev->base_address[(2*port)+1] & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
base = dev->base_address[2*port] & ~7;
--- 346,365 ----
for (port = 0; port <= 1; ++port) {
unsigned long base = 0, ctl = 0;
ide_pci_enablebit_t *e = &(d->enablebits[port]);
+ #ifndef __powerpc__
if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) || (tmp & e->mask) != e->val))
! continue; /* port not enabled */
! #else
! if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) || (tmp & e->mask) != e->val)) {
! pci_write_config_byte(dev, e->reg, tmp | e->val);
! if (e->reg && (pci_read_config_byte(dev, e->reg, &tmp) || (tmp & e->mask) != e->val))
! printk("did not manage to enable port %d\n", port);
! }
! tmp = 0;
! pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x9, &tmp);
! pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x9, tmp | 0x1);
! pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x3c, 0xf);
! #endif
if ((dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE || (dev->class & (port ? 4 : 1)) != 0) {
ctl = dev->base_address[(2*port)+1] & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_IO_MASK;
base = dev->base_address[2*port] & ~7;
--
__
/ ` Eric Valette
/-- __ o _. Canon CRF - Communication Dept
(___, / (_(_(__ Rue de la touche lambert
35517 Cesson-Sevigne Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)2 99 87 68 91 Fax: +33 (0)2 99 84 11 30
E-mail: valette@crf.canon.fr http://www.crf.canon.fr
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: ian reinhart geiser (ADMIN) <hidden> Date: 1999-07-22 16:54:54
i am compileing the postgres ODBC drivers and i get the following
error on linking:
ld -Bdynamic -shared -soname libpsqlodbc.so.0.25 -Bsymbolic -lc -lm -o
libpsqlod
bc.so.0.25 info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o
environ.o
execute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o
results.o sock
et.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lc
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_r_debug@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_unload_cache@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init_next@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_relocate_object@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_initial_searchlist@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope_alloc@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_fpu_control@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_message@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_mcount@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_initialize@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_start_profile@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_check_all_versions@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_loaded@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_main_searchlist@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_map@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_output@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object_deps@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_impcalls@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_state@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_stack_end@@GLIBC_2.1'
make: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.25] Error 1
any ideas on a way to fix this bugger?
-ian reinhart geiser
.-----------------------------------------------------------.
|[] NeXT Generation [X]|
|--------------------------,--------------------------------.
| UNIX GEEK, | Office: I have none... |
| Macintosh Specialist @ | Phone: 414.277.7288 |
| Milwaukee School of | |
| Engineering |--------------------------------|
| | |
| ian reinhart geiser | phone: 414.220.9683 |
| Apt #5 | email: geiseri@msoe.edu |
| 828 N Milwaukee St | web: www.msoe.edu/~geiseri |
| Milwaukee, WI 53202 | NeXT/Be/Cyberdog Mail okay! |
| | MIME or BinHex preferred |
|--------------------------'--------------------------------|
'-----------------------------------------------------------'
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden> Date: 1999-07-23 02:41:51
VALETTE Eric [off-list ref] wrote:
So why did I get no single comment on patches I submitted?
The Prep IDE handling is broken...
The trouble is that "PReP" is such an ill-defined idea. I was
interested to see your patch, but I assume that some other PReP
machines need it the way it is without your patch.
Paul.
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: VALETTE Eric <hidden> Date: 1999-07-23 07:48:13
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Paul" == Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] writes:
Paul> VALETTE Eric [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
So why did I get no single comment on patches I submitted?
The Prep IDE handling is broken...
Paul> The trouble is that "PReP" is such an ill-defined idea. I was
Paul> interested to see your patch, but I assume that some other PReP
Paul> machines need it the way it is without your patch.
Without the patch you can still install and run linux
from PPCBUG using the Network BOot command (NBO) and using
local IDE disks but you fail to use the "pboot;a" booting
directly from hard disk (or at power on)...
AND more annoying, of course you must reinstall your disk
if you formatted it using the non correct ide byte swap handling
-- eric
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
From: Franz Sirl <hidden> Date: 1999-07-24 08:46:53
This looks like a bug in binutils that has been fixed recently. Try 2.9.4.0.8
available on <ftp://dev.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/R5/RPMS/ppc/>.
Franz.
Am Don, 22 Jul 1999 schrieb ian reinhart geiser (ADMIN):
i am compileing the postgres ODBC drivers and i get the following
error on linking:
ld -Bdynamic -shared -soname libpsqlodbc.so.0.25 -Bsymbolic -lc -lm -o
libpsqlod
bc.so.0.25 info.o bind.o columninfo.o connection.o convert.o drvconn.o
environ.o
execute.o lobj.o misc.o options.o pgtypes.o psqlodbc.o qresult.o
results.o sock
et.o parse.o statement.o gpps.o tuple.o tuplelist.o dlg_specific.o -lc
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_r_debug@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_unload_cache@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_init_next@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_relocate_object@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_initial_searchlist@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope_alloc@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_fpu_control@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_message@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_mcount@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_initialize@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_start_profile@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_check_all_versions@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_loaded@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_main_searchlist@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_map@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_profile_output@@GLIBC_2.1'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_map_object_deps@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_impcalls@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_debug_state@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure@@GLIBC_2.0'
/lib/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_stack_end@@GLIBC_2.1'
make: *** [libpsqlodbc.so.0.25] Error 1
any ideas on a way to fix this bugger?
-ian reinhart geiser
.-----------------------------------------------------------.
|[] NeXT Generation [X]|
|--------------------------,--------------------------------.
| UNIX GEEK, | Office: I have none... |
| Macintosh Specialist @ | Phone: 414.277.7288 |
| Milwaukee School of | |
| Engineering |--------------------------------|
| | |
| ian reinhart geiser | phone: 414.220.9683 |
| Apt #5 | email: geiseri@msoe.edu |
| 828 N Milwaukee St | web: www.msoe.edu/~geiseri |
| Milwaukee, WI 53202 | NeXT/Be/Cyberdog Mail okay! |
| | MIME or BinHex preferred |
|--------------------------'--------------------------------|
'-----------------------------------------------------------'
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]