Re: ld bug with -Bsymbolic --noinhibit-exec (2.9.1.0.990418-1c)

Hi Frank,

thanks for your quick reply.  I'm using version 2.9.1.0.15 on Intel.  On
Alpha, I'm using 2.9.1.0.22.

I just downloaded the binutils-2.9.4.0.5 RPM, and it's no more
successful.  :( :(

Eric

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

Franz Sirl [off-list ref] writes:

Hmm, what version of binutils are you using on Intel/Alpha? Does it work on 
Intel/Alpha with binutils-2.9.4.0.[3-5]?

In any case, you can try the RPM of binutils-2.9.4.0.5 on 
<ftp://dev.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/R5/RPMS/ppc> and see if it helps.

Franz.

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

Am Mit, 16 Jun 1999 schrieb Eric Ding:

Hi Frank,

thanks for your quick reply.  I'm using version 2.9.1.0.15 on Intel.  On
Alpha, I'm using 2.9.1.0.22.

I just downloaded the binutils-2.9.4.0.5 RPM, and it's no more
successful.  :( :(

Ok, would you mind trying binutils-2.9.4.0.5 on Intel too? It's available on
<ftp://ftp.varesearch.com/pub/support/hjl/binutils/beta> as a RPM.

I'm trying to sort out if this is related to newer binutils or if it's PPC
specific.

Franz.

BTW, I'm "franzo" on #mklinux/EFNet for even faster feedback :-)

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]