Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add lockdep_assert_not_held()

Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:

quoted

Shuah Khan (3):
  lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
  lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
  ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls

Thanks!

Via which tree should these go?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:45:32AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:

Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 05:06:57PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:

quoted

Shuah Khan (3):
  lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()
  lockdep: add lockdep lock state defines
  ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls

Thanks!

Via which tree should these go?

I've just queued the lot for locking/core, which will show up in tip
when the robots don't hate on it.

Does that work for you?