There is no need to check 'priv->bt_ant_couple_ok' twice in
rs_bt_update_lq(). The second check is always true. Thus, the
expression can be simplified.

Signed-off-by: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index 74229fcb63a9..226165db7dfd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c

@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void rs_bt_update_lq(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct iwl_rxon_context *ctx,
 		 * Is there a need to switch between
 		 * full concurrency and 3-wire?
 		 */
-		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance && priv->bt_ant_couple_ok)
+		if (priv->bt_ci_compliance)
 			full_concurrent = true;
 		else
 			full_concurrent = false;