From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: 2017-03-06 22:08:39
From: Johannes Berg <redacted>
There isn't really much harm in not ignoring, since it doesn't
represent a valid rate, but since we already ignore the HT one
also ignore VHT. Also simplify the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <redacted>
---
net/mac80211/mlme.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Date: 2017-03-07 10:35:29
On 6-3-2017 23:01, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted hunk
From: Johannes Berg <redacted>
There isn't really much harm in not ignoring, since it doesn't
represent a valid rate, but since we already ignore the HT one
also ignore VHT. Also simplify the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <redacted>
---
net/mac80211/mlme.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: 2017-03-07 09:18:27
quoted
/*
- * BSS_MEMBERSHIP_SELECTOR_HT_PHY is defined in
802.11n-2009
- * 7.3.2.2 as a magic value instead of a rate.
Hence, skip it.
+ * Skip HT and VHT BSS membership selectors since
they're not
+ * rates.
*
* Note: Even through the membership selector and
the basic
typo: through -> though.
That's just existing context ;-)
Will fix here.
johannes
From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> Date: 2017-03-07 09:57:37
On 7-3-2017 9:42, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted
quoted
/*
- * BSS_MEMBERSHIP_SELECTOR_HT_PHY is defined in
802.11n-2009
- * 7.3.2.2 as a magic value instead of a rate.
Hence, skip it.
+ * Skip HT and VHT BSS membership selectors since
they're not
+ * rates.
*
* Note: Even through the membership selector and
the basic
typo: through -> though.
That's just existing context ;-)
Will fix here.
I noticed and indeed could create a patch for it, but this is easier
(for me :-p ).
Gr. AvS