eventfs_create_events_dir() allocates the eventfs_inode via
alloc_root_ei(), but only calls INIT_LIST_HEAD() on ei->children
and ei->list after the tracefs_get_inode() check. If that check
fails, the code jumps to the fail label and calls cleanup_ei(),
which calls free_ei():
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&ei->children));
Since ei was allocated with kzalloc(), ei->children.next is NULL
at this point, not a self-referencing pointer. list_empty() checks
head->next == head, so it returns false on an uninitialized list
head, triggering a false-positive WARN_ON_ONCE() even though the
list was never used.
eventfs_create_dir() has the same latent issue: alloc_ei() is
called before INIT_LIST_HEAD(), leaving a window where an early
failure path could hit cleanup_ei() on an uninitialized list head.
Move the INIT_LIST_HEAD() calls into init_ei(), which is called
by both alloc_ei() and alloc_root_ei() immediately after
allocation. This guarantees every eventfs_inode has a valid,
self-linked, empty children/list the moment it is allocated,
regardless of which failure path runs afterward.
Fixes: 5790b1fb3d67 ("eventfs: Remove eventfs_file and just use eventfs_inode")
Reported-by: syzbot+3ef80b4ed02226d04a06@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3ef80b4ed02226d04a06
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <redacted>
---
fs/tracefs/event_inode.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2026-08-24 15:03:58
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:16:53 +0530
Deepanshu Kartikey [off-list ref] wrote:
Yeah, I saw the syzbot report and came up immediately with this fix as
well. But the change log is way too verbose for such a simple fix. Did
you use AI for this patch? If so, you must divulge that information,
usually with a tag.
eventfs_create_events_dir() allocates the eventfs_inode via
alloc_root_ei(), but only calls INIT_LIST_HEAD() on ei->children
and ei->list after the tracefs_get_inode() check. If that check
fails, the code jumps to the fail label and calls cleanup_ei(),
which calls free_ei():
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&ei->children));
Since ei was allocated with kzalloc(), ei->children.next is NULL
at this point, not a self-referencing pointer. list_empty() checks
head->next == head, so it returns false on an uninitialized list
head, triggering a false-positive WARN_ON_ONCE() even though the
list was never used.
eventfs_create_dir() has the same latent issue: alloc_ei() is
called before INIT_LIST_HEAD(), leaving a window where an early
failure path could hit cleanup_ei() on an uninitialized list head.
Move the INIT_LIST_HEAD() calls into init_ei(), which is called
by both alloc_ei() and alloc_root_ei() immediately after
allocation. This guarantees every eventfs_inode has a valid,
self-linked, empty children/list the moment it is allocated,
regardless of which failure path runs afterward.
The change log only needs to say:
eventfs_create_dir() allocates the eventfs_inode and initializes it
with init_ei(). But this does not initialize the eventfs_inode
list_heads. If the eventfs_create_dir() fails due to memory pressure,
it will call free_ei() which checks to make sure the eventfs_inode
has no children. But because the list wasn't initialized, it will
give a false warning.
Fix it by moving the list initialization into init_ei().
See, much better. Right to the point without all the AI slop.
I'll take your patch, but I'm replacing the commit log with the above.
-- Steve
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 8:33 PM Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:16:53 +0530
Deepanshu Kartikey [off-list ref] wrote:
Yeah, I saw the syzbot report and came up immediately with this fix as
well. But the change log is way too verbose for such a simple fix. Did
you use AI for this patch? If so, you must divulge that information,
usually with a tag.
Yes , I have used AI to create a commit log . I will add the tag in v2
and the commit
log you have suggested.
Thanks
Deepanshu
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Date: 2026-08-25 01:36:54
On Tue, 25 Aug 2026 06:53:55 +0530
Deepanshu Kartikey [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 8:33 PM Steven Rostedt [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:16:53 +0530
Deepanshu Kartikey [off-list ref] wrote:
Yeah, I saw the syzbot report and came up immediately with this fix as
well. But the change log is way too verbose for such a simple fix. Did
you use AI for this patch? If so, you must divulge that information,
usually with a tag.
Yes , I have used AI to create a commit log . I will add the tag in v2
and the commit
log you have suggested.
No need. I pulled your patch and just rewrote the change log. It's now
in my queue.
Thanks,
-- Steve